We appreciate the article ''Impact of Lesion Length on Functional Significance in Intermediate Coronary Lesions'' written by Iguchi et al. and read this article with great interest. 1 The authors aimed to investigate the relationships between lesion length, coronary stenosis, and myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) of lesions. The study concluded that the regression analysis revealed an inverse correlation between the percentage of diameter stenosis (%DS) and FFR in patients with significant coronary artery stenosis (group S). In the intermediate group (group I), no significant correlation was found between %DS and FFR, whereas lesion length was significantly inversely correlated with FFR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the best cutoff value for predicting an FFR value < 0.80 was a lesion length > 16.1 mm in group I. These findings suggest that lesion length has a physiologically significant impact on intermediate-grade coronary lesions. The subject is important in terms of our daily practice, and the study deserves highlighting of its successful design and results.Coronary lesion severity should be evaluated using both anatomical and physiological myocardial ischemia methods. Coronary angiography is the conventional gold standard anatomical evaluation method. In addition, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography have markedly improved evaluation accuracy. On the other hand, physiological assessment, including stress electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and single-photon emission computed tomography cannot be performed simultaneously with anatomical evaluation. FFR is beneficial in the assessment of coronary lesion ischemia because of allowing simultaneous evaluation with anatomical assessment. The FFR value in the functional severity of coronary artery stenoses has become a necessary tool for clinical decision making in catheterization laboratories recently.2 FFR measurement also has been used to assess optimal percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) results for prediction of favorable long-term clinical outcomes. FFR-guided PCI was associated with favorable outcomes in bifurcation lesions with native side branch vessels blocked by stent implantation.3 All of these above results may indicate that FFR is a valuable tool to determine whether or not a segment is intermediately stenotic. 4 In addition, coronary risk factors such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia may inversely affect coronary lesion features. If the authors evaluated the correlation between coronary risk factors and coronary lesions, the results of this study might have been seen differently.