2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Malaria in Pregnancy as Latin America Approaches Elimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been proposed that exposure to P. vivax can elicit IgG responses that cross-react with VAR2CSA-type PfEMP1 ( 16 , 23 ). This hypothesis is consistent with both the pregnancy restriction of VAR2CSA reactivity in Africa (where P. vivax is rare and not an important cause of placental malaria [ 24 ]) and the apparent absence of such restriction in Colombia (where P. vivax is common).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proposed that exposure to P. vivax can elicit IgG responses that cross-react with VAR2CSA-type PfEMP1 ( 16 , 23 ). This hypothesis is consistent with both the pregnancy restriction of VAR2CSA reactivity in Africa (where P. vivax is rare and not an important cause of placental malaria [ 24 ]) and the apparent absence of such restriction in Colombia (where P. vivax is common).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the accelerated progress toward malaria elimination in most of Latin America, 6,32 an estimated 4.3 million women are at risk of MiP each year in this continent. 1 Here, we show that antenatal malaria remains common in the main malaria hotspot of Brazil, affecting 8.0% of our study participantscomparable with the recent prevalence estimate at 7.9% in Guayaramerín, an endemic setting in Bolivia next to the border with Brazil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] The clinical implications of malaria during pregnancy remain understudied in low-endemicity regions where Plasmodium vivax predominates, such as Latin America. 2,5,6 This is partially due to the fact that infections with P. vivax are believed to cause less severe clinical consequences in pregnant women than those with P. falciparum, although an increased risk of LBW and anemia associated with infection has been documented in large studies. 2,5,[7][8][9][10] Erythrocytes parasitized with the former species do not sequester massively in the intervillous spaces as they do in P. falciparum infections, 11,12 but some MiP-associated histological changes in the placenta, such as syncytial knotting and increased thickness of the placental barrier, have been recently documented in Brazil 12,13 and may affect fetal nutrition and growth because of impaired transport and secretory functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Colombia, the current national guidelines for malaria control recommend the active detection of cases at each antenatal care visit in all pregnant women living in endemic areas of the country [6]. However, the diagnosis of malaria in pregnancy by conventional diagnostic tools, such as microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), remains challenging for the detection of low-density infections, common in areas of low to moderate endemicity such as Latin America [4,7,8]. Moreover, the unique ability of P. falciparum parasites to massively sequester in the placenta also contributes to a reduced detectability of maternal infections in peripheral blood [4,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%