2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of malnutrition on gastrointestinal surgical patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
75
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
75
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings of increased 30‐day readmissions in malnourished patients generally agree with others. In patients with gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, readmissions were more frequent in the malnourished (22.6% vs 16.1%, P = .045) . In Veterans Affairs (VA) case–control patients, readmissions were greater in the malnourished group (31% vs 12%) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings of increased 30‐day readmissions in malnourished patients generally agree with others. In patients with gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, readmissions were more frequent in the malnourished (22.6% vs 16.1%, P = .045) . In Veterans Affairs (VA) case–control patients, readmissions were greater in the malnourished group (31% vs 12%) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller samples using the AND/ASPEN criteria agree with our finding that in‐hospital mortality is increased in malnourished patients, and report even higher mortality rates after the hospital discharge. In 490 patients who had GI surgery, malnutrition was associated with higher in‐hospital mortality (7.5% vs 2.3%, P < .021) . When criteria similar to AND/ASPEN criteria were used in 1361 emergency surgery patients in a single ICU, mortality was increased in malnourished patients (nonspecific malnutrition vs protein‐energy malnutrition vs no malnutrition, respectively: in‐hospital mortality, 10.8% vs 18.7% vs 6.8%, P = .001; 90‐day mortality, 18.6% vs 31.8% vs 13.1%, P < .001; 12‐month mortality, 29.3% vs 48.6% vs 25.6%, P < .001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among critically ill patients assessed by the AND/ASPEN criteria in the intensive care unit (ICU) (n = 327), Ceniccola et al showed that patients with malnutrition had significantly increased mortality rates compared with patients without malnutrition . Most studies that have explored the effects of malnutrition on LOS or mortality have had small sample sizes, were conducted internationally, or have used other validated screening tools . By validating these characteristics in larger hospital settings, we can demonstrate the importance of standardizing the data collection process and begin to elucidate relevant diseases or conditions associated with malnutrition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter undoubtedly facilitates the “practice” of non‐nutrition experts who are not familiar with SGA. It is unquestionable that the ASPEN/AND tool should be adequately validated, which has been attempted, to my knowledge, by 2 groups of authors in Portugal and in the United States, with interesting results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%