2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar co-selection of sulphonamide resistance genes was reported in chickens treated with streptomycin [32]. Moreso, a Canadian study found a predominant pattern of AMR with extended-spectrum cephalosporin (ESC)-resistant E. coli strains, with co-resistance to streptomycin, cefoxitin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline [30]. Also, in an extensive study of E. coli isolates from various countries authors observed that nearly 75% of ampicillin-resistant E. coli isolates were also resistant to streptomycin and tetracycline [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A similar co-selection of sulphonamide resistance genes was reported in chickens treated with streptomycin [32]. Moreso, a Canadian study found a predominant pattern of AMR with extended-spectrum cephalosporin (ESC)-resistant E. coli strains, with co-resistance to streptomycin, cefoxitin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, sulfisoxazole, ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline [30]. Also, in an extensive study of E. coli isolates from various countries authors observed that nearly 75% of ampicillin-resistant E. coli isolates were also resistant to streptomycin and tetracycline [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Isolates were tested for susceptibility to the 14 antimicrobial agents examined in the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Surveillance (CIPARS 2008) using the disk‐diffusion assay as previously described . The following antimicrobial disks were used: azithromycin (15 μg), streptomycin (STR; 10 μg), gentamicin (GEN; 10 μg), trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole (23.75 μg), sulfisoxazole (SSS; 250 μg), tetracycline (TET; 30 μg), nalidixic acid (NAL; 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP; 5 μg), chloramphenicol (CHL; 30 μg), ampicillin (AMP; 10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC; 30 μg), cefoxitin (FOX; 30 μg), ceftriaxone (CRO; 30 μg), and XNL (30 μg).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coli isolates were examined for susceptibility to the same 15 antimicrobial agents examined in the Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) surveillance programme in Canada [11] using the disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) assay as previously described [12]. E. coli isolates were considered MDR based on the definitions described by Magiorakos et al (nonsusceptibility to at least one antimicrobial agent in three or more antimicrobial-defined categories) [13].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%