2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of multilateral place dimensions on corporate brand attractiveness and identification in higher education: Business school insights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Elbedweihy et al (2016) and So et al (2017) show that when consumers find the brand attractive, they are more likely to define their identity with it. Other studies also suggest that customer perceptions of attractiveness can increase customer identification (Ahearne et al, 2005;Balmer et al, 2020;Marin and De Maya, 2013). Therefore, we further suppose in the tourism field that: H2: Destination attractiveness positively influences cognitive (H2a), affective (H2b), and evaluative (H2c) tourist-destination identification.…”
Section: Memorable Destination Experience and Tourist-destination Identificationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For example, Elbedweihy et al (2016) and So et al (2017) show that when consumers find the brand attractive, they are more likely to define their identity with it. Other studies also suggest that customer perceptions of attractiveness can increase customer identification (Ahearne et al, 2005;Balmer et al, 2020;Marin and De Maya, 2013). Therefore, we further suppose in the tourism field that: H2: Destination attractiveness positively influences cognitive (H2a), affective (H2b), and evaluative (H2c) tourist-destination identification.…”
Section: Memorable Destination Experience and Tourist-destination Identificationmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A study by Melewar and Karaosmanoglu (2006) found seven corporate brand factors and Hafeez et al (2016) highlighted eight items that were recognized and analyzed. Several scholars have explored the cultural and ethical principles (Ind, 1992), while others have explained the role played by culture and philosophy (Balmer, 1995) and still others have focused on the role of business strategy (Balmer et al , 2020; Kristal et al , 2020). Thus, it is evident that corporate branding is a context-related item, and hence, this study enriches this wide stream of research.…”
Section: Discussion and Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current paper has combined the corporate brand dimensions in a different way to past research. A study by Melewar and Karaosmanoglu (2006) Ind, 1992), whilst others have explained the role played by culture and philosophy (Balmer, 1998), and still others have focused on the role of business strategy (Balmer et al, 2020;Kristal et al, 2020;van Riel, 1997). Thus, it is evident that corporate branding is a context-related item, and hence, this study enriches this wide stream of research.…”
Section: "Insert Figure-ii-here"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research investigates corporate image variables through two indicators, functional and psychological ( Balmer, 2012 ; Balmer et al., 2019 ; Boulding, 1956 ; Kennedy, 1977 ). while functional indicators measure corporate image through attractiveness, service, familiarity, comfort and advocacy the Psychological indicators measure corporate image through favorability, trust, reputation and awareness (see Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Company image is a collection of perceptions, beliefs and impressions made by an organization so that stakeholders and the public have an opinion of identity ( Balmer et al., 2019 ; Iglesias et al., 2019b ). Boulding (1956) as an expert who proclaimed the meaning of corporate image identified corporate image into two views, namely functional and psychological opinions.…”
Section: Critical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%