2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
12
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[35,36] The medial olivocochlear (MOC) system has also been studied after exposure to noise. The results are contradictory with reports of no MOC influence, [34,37] and with signs of such an effect when the MOC function was measured after the exposure. [38] In the present study the NAC group, but not the control group, had a significant increase in correlated TEOAE response 3 hours after exposure (which was also 3 hours after the first NAC tablet), but showed no significant change in contralateral suppression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…[35,36] The medial olivocochlear (MOC) system has also been studied after exposure to noise. The results are contradictory with reports of no MOC influence, [34,37] and with signs of such an effect when the MOC function was measured after the exposure. [38] In the present study the NAC group, but not the control group, had a significant increase in correlated TEOAE response 3 hours after exposure (which was also 3 hours after the first NAC tablet), but showed no significant change in contralateral suppression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Due to a good correlation between MOC reflex strength and PTS provoked by high-level noise, Maison and Liberman ͑2000͒ suggested MOC reflex strength to be a possible predictor for vulnerability to noise overexposure. However, this finding could not be verified in workers of a metal-working factory exposed to occupational mid-level noise for one workday ͑Müller and Janssen, 2008͒. The present study should extend the work by Müller and Janssen ͑2008͒ by studying the effects of high-level discotheque music instead of mid-level occupational noise. The study should provide information concerning the following issues: ͑i͒ do three hours of high-level discotheque music exert any measurable impact on overall hearing capability and especially on OHC functionality and if so, ͑ii͒ is there a similar effect on pure-tone thresholds and DPOAE levels;…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Müller and Janssen [2008] did not find any correlations between CS of DPOAE and the TTS induced by 1 day of occupational noise, or the TTS caused by 3 h of noise exposure in a discotheque [Müller et al, 2010], respectively. In some of the previous studies [Wagner et al, 2005;Müller and Janssen, 2008], the amount of TTS was rather small, thus limiting the distinction of individual noise vulnerability; further, noise exposure probably varied to some extent due to field study conditions [Veuillet et al, 1991;Wagner et al, 2005;Müller and Janssen, 2008]. In contrast, the present study included: (1) two different CS paradigms, (2) CS measurement in duplicate and (3) exactly defined experimental noise exposure under laboratory conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%