2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2012.01312.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of physician assistance on the reliability of the International Index of Erectile Function

Abstract: The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of assistance on the comprehensibility and reliability of the Turkish version of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). In this study, 458 patients were asked to complete the IIEF questionnaire by themselves during their first visit and then once again during their second visit with the assistance of a physician. The impact of physician assistance was evaluated by comparing the first and second questionnaires. The data were analysed using statistical pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Questionnaires are the main tools to evaluate erectile function in humans. Among these questionnaires, the IIEF is the most widely used multidimensional self‐report instrument (Rosen et al ., ; Bayraktar & Atun, ). Despite strong psychometric properties and wide adoption, the IIEF has limitations or weaknesses in specific areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questionnaires are the main tools to evaluate erectile function in humans. Among these questionnaires, the IIEF is the most widely used multidimensional self‐report instrument (Rosen et al ., ; Bayraktar & Atun, ). Despite strong psychometric properties and wide adoption, the IIEF has limitations or weaknesses in specific areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 studies reported on internal consistency of the IIEF-15 1,15,16,22,26,28,31,34e36,38,41,43,50,51 (Supplementary Table 1). Methodologic quality of these studies was rated as "very good", 1,16,22,28,36,38,50,51 "adequate", 26,31,43 or "inadequate". 16,34,35,41 The inadequate scores were due to only reporting internal consistency for the total IIEF-15 instead of its subscales 16,34,41 or because of a very small sample size ("other flaws" in COSMIN methodologic quality).…”
Section: Internal Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methodologic quality of these studies was rated as "very good", 1,16,22,28,36,38,50,51 "adequate", 26,31,43 or "inadequate". 16,34,35,41 The inadequate scores were due to only reporting internal consistency for the total IIEF-15 instead of its subscales 16,34,41 or because of a very small sample size ("other flaws" in COSMIN methodologic quality). 35 8 studies, of "very good", 15,28,36,50 "adequate", 31 and "inadequate" 34,35,41 quality, reported Cronbach's a of sufficient values of the IIEF-15.…”
Section: Internal Consistencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations