OFC/NFOEC 2008 - 2008 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication/National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ofc.2008.4528545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Polarization Dependent Loss and Cross-Phase Modulation on Polarization Multiplexed DQPSK Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to investigate the robustness of the proposed OSNR monitoring technique against different signal pulse shapes, timing phase offsets, PDL and first-order PMD effects, we studied the performance of our proposed OSNR monitor in NRZ-PM-16-QAM and 50% Return-to-Zero (RZ)-PM-16-QAM systems and a fiber link with PDL ranging from 0 to 4 dB (with 0 and 45 angles between signal state of polarization (SOP) and PDL axis) using the distributed PDL model described in [26] and differential group delay (DGD) values ranging from 0 to 20 ps (with 0 , 22.5 and 45 angles between signal SOP and fiber principle states of polarization (PSP)). The timing phases considered include 0, 1/8, 1/4 and 3/8 symbols away from optimal sampling instants at the pulse peaks.…”
Section: Simulation Results For 224 Gb/s Pm-16-qam Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate the robustness of the proposed OSNR monitoring technique against different signal pulse shapes, timing phase offsets, PDL and first-order PMD effects, we studied the performance of our proposed OSNR monitor in NRZ-PM-16-QAM and 50% Return-to-Zero (RZ)-PM-16-QAM systems and a fiber link with PDL ranging from 0 to 4 dB (with 0 and 45 angles between signal state of polarization (SOP) and PDL axis) using the distributed PDL model described in [26] and differential group delay (DGD) values ranging from 0 to 20 ps (with 0 , 22.5 and 45 angles between signal SOP and fiber principle states of polarization (PSP)). The timing phases considered include 0, 1/8, 1/4 and 3/8 symbols away from optimal sampling instants at the pulse peaks.…”
Section: Simulation Results For 224 Gb/s Pm-16-qam Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PMD can be effectively equalized, PDL is a more challenging impairment for coherent systems [28][29][30][31], particularly for those employing numerous ROADMs. Depending on the relative orientation of the polarization tributaries to the PDL axis, a single PDL element causes a power and/or OSNR difference of the two polarization tributaries and/or non-orthogonality of the (originally orthogonal) polarization tributaries.…”
Section: B Polarization Dependent Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty on channel capacity induced by PDL was evaluated in [6], [7]. In [8], the PDL effect on a lumped channel model was determined, while [9] studied the best and worst cases of this model. This was extended in [10], for both lumped and distributed channel models, for worst, best, and average alignment between the signal and PDL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was extended in [10], for both lumped and distributed channel models, for worst, best, and average alignment between the signal and PDL. In [8], [10], it was shown that the lumped model is not precise since it does not consider the effect of PDL on noise. Finally, in [11], the effect of PDL combined with nonlinear effects was studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%