2010
DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edp045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Poll Results on Personal Opinions and Perceptions of Collective Opinion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, across the UGCs-only, AURs-only, as well as UGCs-and-AURs conditions, the congruency of the opinion climate was found to influence participants' perceptions of the opinion climate regarding nuclear energy. These findings corroborate with the argument that users are made cognizant of other's attitudes toward an issue through opinion cues on online and social media, and generalize them to be representative of public opinion (Brosius, 1999;Sonck & Loosveldt, 2010;Zerback et al, 2015). This shows that people perceive the online opinion climate through different opinion cues and underscores the importance of examining both types of opinion cues in the investigation of perceptions of the opinion climate.…”
Section: Influence Of Opinion Cues On Perceptions Of the Opinion Climatesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, across the UGCs-only, AURs-only, as well as UGCs-and-AURs conditions, the congruency of the opinion climate was found to influence participants' perceptions of the opinion climate regarding nuclear energy. These findings corroborate with the argument that users are made cognizant of other's attitudes toward an issue through opinion cues on online and social media, and generalize them to be representative of public opinion (Brosius, 1999;Sonck & Loosveldt, 2010;Zerback et al, 2015). This shows that people perceive the online opinion climate through different opinion cues and underscores the importance of examining both types of opinion cues in the investigation of perceptions of the opinion climate.…”
Section: Influence Of Opinion Cues On Perceptions Of the Opinion Climatesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The quantity of online user feedback was found to be associated with audiences' subsequent attitudes and behaviors (Duan, Gu, & Whinston, 2008;Ellison & Fudenberg, 1995). Specifically, research has provided evidence that audiences generalize numeric aggregations as being representative of public opinion (Daschmann, 2000;Sonck & Loosveldt, 2010;Zerback, Koch, & Krämer, 2015). In such instances, people rely on AURs as representations of the opinion climate to assess the acceptability or appropriateness of a point of view amid the abundance of information availability and attitude uncertainty regarding an obscure topic (e.g., nuclear energy; Flanagin & Metzger, 2008).…”
Section: Perceiving the Mediated Opinion Climatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those that do exist demonstrate contradictory results (e.g., Marsh, 1985;Nadeau, Cloutier, & Guay, 1993;Ragozzino & Hartman, 2014;Sonck & Loosveldt, 2010). Recent experiments that presented respondents with opinion polls showing varying levels of support for different political issues found that respondents did react to the treatment and moved in the direction of the perceived majority on somethough not all-of the issues (Rothschild & Malhotra, 2014).…”
Section: Poll Influence In Nonelectoral Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesta linha de pesquisa podem ser encontradas discussões mais aprofundadas sobre o tema, como, por exemplo, media e disseminação de informação, influência e audiência, opiniões pessoais e coletivas, e todas as suas consequências político-eleitorais. Para mais sobre o tema, verSonck & Loosveldt (2010).…”
unclassified