Remarkable advances in our understanding of the genetic contributions to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have sparked discussion and debate about whether clinical genetic testing should routinely be offered to patients with ALS. A related, but distinct, question is whether presymptomatic genetic testing should be offered to family members who may be at risk for developing ALS. Existing guidelines for presymptomatic counseling and testing are mostly based on small number of individuals, clinical judgment, and experience from other neurodegenerative disorders. Over the course of the last 8 years, we have provided testing and 317 genetic counseling sessions (including predecision, pretest, posttest, and ad hoc counseling) to 161 first-degree family members participating in the Pre-Symptomatic Familial ALS Study (Pre-fALS), as well as testing and 75 posttest counseling sessions to 63 individuals with familial ALS. Based on this experience, and the real-world challenges we have had to overcome in the process, we recommend an updated set of guidelines for providing presymptomatic genetic counseling and testing to people at high genetic risk for developing ALS. These recommendations are especially timely and relevant given the growing interest in studying presymptomatic ALS. Published guidelines for presymptomatic genetic testing (psGT) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [1][2][3] have been based in part on experience in Huntington disease (HD) 4,5 and other lateonset neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, 6,7 and in part on experience in a small number of first-degree relatives of patients with superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) familial ALS.8 As the spectrum of identified genetic causes of ALS expands and the landscape of ALS genetics becomes ever more complex, 9,10 there is an increasing need to revisit the proposed guidelines. In this article, we highlight clinically relevant aspects of the genetic complexity of ALS and, drawing on the extensive experience acquired through the ongoing Pre-Symptomatic Familial ALS Study (Pre-fALS), present an approach to psGT that we have developed and refined over the last 8 years. While our experience derives from, and is most relevant to, psGT in the research arena, it may also inform the more controversial endeavor of psGT in a clinical setting.BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE "Familial," "sporadic," and "genetic" ALS. Traditionally, a distinction has been drawn between familial ALS (fALS) and sporadic ALS (sALS) based on the presence or absence of a family history of ALS, with a genetic etiology presupposed for fALS, but not for those without a family history. This distinction, however, is artificial and the inference about genetic etiology incorrect, as all the genes known to cause fALS have also been identified in patients with (seemingly) sALS.9 Some have proposed as an alternative the term hereditary ALS.11 While there are many reasons why ALS with a known genetic cause may not reveal a family history (e.g., recessive inheritance, compound heterozygosity, ...