2021
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Previous Irradiation on Wound Healing after Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients—A Systematic Review

Abstract: (1) Background: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been effectively used for wound management in comparison to traditional dressings. The purpose of this study was to provide an evidence-based review of NPWT in head and neck cancer patients, as well as the impact of previous irradiation and other risk factors on wound healing. (2) Material and Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant literature. (3) Results: 15 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) employs an intelligent negative‐pressure suction system to create continuous or intermittent negative pressure in a sealed wound area, promoting wound healing through efficient drainage, infection control, and improved tissue perfusion 10–12 . An international expert panel consensus recommends the application of NPWT to various routine surgical incisions, including those in cardiothoracic, head and neck, general, orthopedic, and gynecological surgeries 13–17 . Multiple studies have confirmed that the appropriate use of NPWT can reduce the incidence of postoperative wound infections, 18,19 offering a new approach to preventing wound infection following vascular surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) employs an intelligent negative‐pressure suction system to create continuous or intermittent negative pressure in a sealed wound area, promoting wound healing through efficient drainage, infection control, and improved tissue perfusion 10–12 . An international expert panel consensus recommends the application of NPWT to various routine surgical incisions, including those in cardiothoracic, head and neck, general, orthopedic, and gynecological surgeries 13–17 . Multiple studies have confirmed that the appropriate use of NPWT can reduce the incidence of postoperative wound infections, 18,19 offering a new approach to preventing wound infection following vascular surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Pre-operative and post-operative use of negative pressure wound therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and platelet antiaggregating agents have shown promise in reducing time to healing and wound complications. [21][22][23] It should be mentioned that in the United States insurance environment, approval for non-traditional therapies can be very difficult to obtain in a timely fashion and often requires the engagement of the treating physician and outside experts in these cases, in the experiences of the REAC/TS staff. For example, hyperbaric oxygen treatments, which is a therapeutic treatment frequently employed in dealing with chronic ulcers, have shown efficacy with soft tissue radiation injuries but in the REAC/TS experience require more treatments than usual for chronic wound or ulcer treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to exacerbating radiation-induced injury to the cardiovascular system, GI, and lungs, the combination of DM and radiation-induced microvascular damage may slow wound healing; a major concern given the likelihood of combined injuries in a radiological or nuclear incident (167,168). The exacerbation of all of these radiation injuries by diabetic complications is further concerning given that diabetic patients are at higher risk of infection due to hyperglycemia-related suppression of neutrophil function, depression of the antioxidant system, and more (157).…”
Section: Populations With Comorbidities or Lifestyle Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%