Impact of Prolift procedure on bladder function and symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse

Su, Tsung-Hsien; Liu, Po-En; Lau, Hui-Hsuan; Huang, Wen‐Chen; Lin, Tzu‐Yin; Hsieh, Ching-Hung

doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1326-7

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This method is simple, yet could effectively decrease SUI incidence. 18 Significant improvements in POP-Q were seen among this patient population, offering an objective, longer term outcome measure for synthetic meshaugmented repair. Meanwhile, significant improvement of QOL was also observed.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Surgical outcomes and quality of life post‐synthetic mesh‐augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population

Sun

Zhang

Wang

2013

J of Obstet and Gynaecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Surgical outcomes and quality of life post‐synthetic mesh‐augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population

Sun

Zhang

Wang

2013

J of Obstet and Gynaecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, planning combined POP and anti‐incontinence procedures may not be recommended since the symptoms of SUI may sometimes resolve after POP surgery. Thus, unnecessary anti‐incontinence surgery may be avoided (LOE 3, grade 1C) 59 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, unnecessary anti-incontinence surgery may be avoided (LOE 3, grade 1C). 59 A MUS performed combined with POP surgery reduces the risk of postoperative SUI. However, short-term voiding difficulties, other LUTS, and adverse events are more frequent with combined surgery (LOE 1, grade 1A).…”

Section: Patients With Sui and Concomitant Popmentioning

confidence: 99%

FIGO recommendations: Use of midurethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

Lau

Davila

Chen

et al. 2023

Intl J Gynecology & Obste

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a global problem. It can significantly adversely impact a woman's quality of life. The use of synthetic mesh in vaginal surgery is controversial, especially when used for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Although negative effects have been reported, the synthetic mesh midurethral sling (MUS) is considered to be safe and effective in the surgical treatment of SUI.Objectives: To provide evidence-based data and recommendations for the obstetrician/gynecologist who treats women with SUI and performs or plans to perform MUS procedures. Methods: Academic searches of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Google Scholar articles published between 1987 and March 2020 were performed by a subgroup of the Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO).Selection Criteria: The obtained scientific data were associated with a level of evidence according to the Oxford University Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and GRADE Working Group system. In the absence of concrete scientific evidence, the recommendations were made via professional consensus. Results:The FIGO Urogynecology and Pelvic Floor Committee reviewed the literature and prepared this evidence-based recommendations document for the use of MUS for women with SUI.Conclusions: Despite the extensive literature, there is a lack of consensus in the optimal surgical treatment of SUI. These recommendations provide a direction for surgeons to make appropriate decisions regarding management of SUI. The MUS is considered safe and effective in the treatment of SUI, based on many high-quality scientific publications and professional society recommendations. Comprehensive long-term data and systemic reviews are still needed, and these data will become increasingly important as women live longer. These recommendations will be continuously updated through future literature reviews.

show abstract

“…However, POSUI might not be subsumed to the complications of anterior reconstruction because most of the POSUI could be ascribed to occult incontinence, which is believed to be due to the correction of anatomic urethral kinking or obstruction from the advanced prolapse [21]. Instead of POSUI, other urodynamic parameters such as storage function and impaired bladder capacity [22] might be affected by the surgical procedures of anterior reconstruction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

A modified anterior compartment reconstruction and Prolift-a for the treatment of anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a non-inferiority study

Xiang

2011

Arch Gynecol Obstet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Impact of Prolift procedure on bladder function and symptoms in women with pelvic organ prolapse

Cited by 11 publications

References 17 publications

Surgical outcomes and quality of life post‐synthetic mesh‐augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population

Surgical outcomes and quality of life post‐synthetic mesh‐augmented repair for pelvic organ prolapse in the Chinese population

FIGO recommendations: Use of midurethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

A modified anterior compartment reconstruction and Prolift-a for the treatment of anterior pelvic organ prolapse: a non-inferiority study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About