2009
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2009.2023801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Radiometric Calibration and Specifications of Spaceborne Optical Imaging Sensors on the Development of Operational Automatic Remote Sensing Image Understanding Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this trend, new opportunities in the design and implementation of operational hybrid RS-IUSs have been proposed to the RS community in recent years [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Significant contributions of these related works include the following:…”
Section: Problem Recognition and Opportunity Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with this trend, new opportunities in the design and implementation of operational hybrid RS-IUSs have been proposed to the RS community in recent years [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Significant contributions of these related works include the following:…”
Section: Problem Recognition and Opportunity Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reach its goal, the rest of this work is focused on the comparison, encompassing the four levels of understanding of an information processing system (refer to Section 1), of state-of-the-art GEOBIA and GEOOIA systems with the novel hybrid RS-IUS design and operational implementation proposed in [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Problem Recognition and Opportunity Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, no atmospheric correction was made to both the images [6]. As a consequence, the consideration that the atmosphere contributes in a different way to the reflectance measured by sensors, due to the different day of acquisition and the different flight height of sensors, should be observed.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Targets' Spectral Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proposed instantiation of mDMI set of EO OP-Q 2 Is includes: (i) degree of automation, inversely related to human-machine interaction, (ii) effectiveness, e.g., thematic mapping accuracy, (iii) efficiency in computation time and in run-time memory occupation, e.g., inversely related to the number of system’s free-parameters to be user-defined based on heuristics, (iv) robustness (vice versa, sensitivity) to changes in input data, (v) robustness to changes in input parameters to be user-defined, (vi) scalability to changes in user requirements and in sensor specifications, (vii) timeliness from data acquisition to information product generation, (viii) costs in manpower and computer power, (ix) value, e.g., semantic value of output products, economic value of output services, etc. (Baraldi, 2017, 2009; Baraldi & Boschetti, 2012a, 2012b; Baraldi, Boschetti, & Humber, 2014; Baraldi et al, 2010a, 2010b; Baraldi, Gironda, & Simonetti, 2010c; Duke, 2016). According to the Pareto formal analysis of multi-objective optimization problems, optimization of an mDMI set of OP-Q 2 Is is an inherently-ill posed problem in the Hadamard sense (Hadamard, 1902), where many Pareto optimal solutions lying on the Pareto efficient frontier can be considered equally good (Boschetti, Flasse, & Brivio, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%