“…A proposed instantiation of mDMI set of EO OP-Q 2 Is includes: (i) degree of automation, inversely related to human-machine interaction, (ii) effectiveness, e.g., thematic mapping accuracy, (iii) efficiency in computation time and in run-time memory occupation, e.g., inversely related to the number of system’s free-parameters to be user-defined based on heuristics, (iv) robustness (vice versa, sensitivity) to changes in input data, (v) robustness to changes in input parameters to be user-defined, (vi) scalability to changes in user requirements and in sensor specifications, (vii) timeliness from data acquisition to information product generation, (viii) costs in manpower and computer power, (ix) value, e.g., semantic value of output products, economic value of output services, etc. (Baraldi, 2017, 2009; Baraldi & Boschetti, 2012a, 2012b; Baraldi, Boschetti, & Humber, 2014; Baraldi et al, 2010a, 2010b; Baraldi, Gironda, & Simonetti, 2010c; Duke, 2016). According to the Pareto formal analysis of multi-objective optimization problems, optimization of an mDMI set of OP-Q 2 Is is an inherently-ill posed problem in the Hadamard sense (Hadamard, 1902), where many Pareto optimal solutions lying on the Pareto efficient frontier can be considered equally good (Boschetti, Flasse, & Brivio, 2004).…”