Heat and moisture (HM) transfer simulations of building envelopes and whole building energy simulations require adequate weather files. The common approach is to use weather data of reference years constructed from meteorological records. The weather record affects the capability of representing the real weather of the resulting reference years. In this paper the problem of the influence of the length of the records on the representativeness of the reference years is addressed and its effects are evaluated also for the applicative case of the moisture accumulation risk analysis with the Glaser Method and with DELPHIN 6, confirming that records shorter than 10 years could lead to less representative reference years. On the other hand, it is shown that reference years obtained from longer periods are not representative of the most recent years, which present higher dry-bulb air temperatures due to a short-term climate change effect observed in all the considered weather records. An alternative representative year (Moisture Representative Year) to be used in building energy simulations with a strong dependence on moisture is presented. This requirement could be very restrictive, for example, for the regions with only recently installed weather stations. The aim of this work is to investigate the influence of the MY length on the moisture accumulation risk assessment performed using reference years for four cities of the Northern Italy. In addition, a reference year, alternative to the TMY for the moisture related building simulations is presented.
Heat and Moisture Transfer SimulationsThe simulation of the building envelope could be performed considering the coupled transfer of heat and moisture. The resulting simulation provides an accurate calculation of the heat losses, including in the calculations also the variability of the thermal material properties due to the variation of the moisture content and the temperature and the latent heat losses due to the moisture migration. These types of models have been introduced in the whole building energy simulations and their influence has been proven to be relevant in several situations. A review on the effects of an inappropriate estimation of moisture content in materials is presented in [2]. Several examples of calculation methods and tools used to perform these simulations, with different hypotheses, are presented in literature (a review of the simulation methods is presented in [3]). A comparison between the effects of using different models of heat and moisture transfer in EnergyPlus whole building simulations is presented in [4], where the models are used to compare the moisture buffering effect of the hygroscopic materials calculated with different models on the internal environmental conditions. In [5], the implementation of the heat and moisture transfer model that considers the moisture hysteresis of hygroscopic materials (described in [6] and implemented in the software MATCH) is implemented in a whole building simulation tool, BSim). Similarly, [7] presents ...