2018
DOI: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of relational coordination on staff and patient outcomes in outpatient surgical clinics

Abstract: Even when patient-staff interactions are relatively brief, as in outpatient settings, high levels of relational coordination among interdependent workgroups contribute to positive outcomes for both staff and patients, and low levels tend to have the opposite effect. Clinical leaders can increase the expectation of positive outcomes for both staff and their patients by implementing interventions to strengthen relational coordination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
69
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings reveal that relational coordination plays an important role in influencing both job satisfaction and affective commitment, which in turn influence turnover intention. These findings support previous findings that have reported similar relationships between relational coordination and job satisfaction (Gittell et al, ; Gittell et al, ; Havens, Gittel, & Vasey, ; Havens et al, ). However, they extend on these findings by suggesting that relational coordination plays an important role in enhancing both job satisfaction and affective commitment, which act as important mechanisms in reducing turnover intention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings reveal that relational coordination plays an important role in influencing both job satisfaction and affective commitment, which in turn influence turnover intention. These findings support previous findings that have reported similar relationships between relational coordination and job satisfaction (Gittell et al, ; Gittell et al, ; Havens, Gittel, & Vasey, ; Havens et al, ). However, they extend on these findings by suggesting that relational coordination plays an important role in enhancing both job satisfaction and affective commitment, which act as important mechanisms in reducing turnover intention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Relational coordination has been found to significantly improve job satisfaction among nurses and nurses’ aids (Gittell, Weinberg, Pfefferle, & Bishop, ; Havens, Vasey, Gittell, & Lin, ). Two recent studies that examined the association between relational coordination, job satisfaction, work engagement, and burnout reported significant associations (Gittell et al, ; Havens, Gittell, & Vasey, ). Both studies found that increased relational coordination is positively associated with job satisfaction and work engagement and negatively associated with burnout.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…71 A recent study across 11 outpatient surgical clinics demonstrated improved job satisfaction, higher work engagement, and less burnout when "relational coordination" was championed in the workplace. 72 Relational coordination, described as a measure of teamwork in health care, emphasizes shared goals, accountability, mutual respect, teamwork, and open communication, and has been associated with heightened work quality and workplace well-being across diverse professions. 73 Investigators at the Mayo Clinic have embraced a multipronged organizational strategy that focuses on acknowledging and assessing burnout; developing, implementing, and measuring the impact of interventions; cultivating a sense of community built on the principles of relational coordination; and both promoting and enabling work-life balance and self-care.…”
Section: Lessons From the Front Line: Strategies To Reduce Burnoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include TeamSTEPPS and Medical Team Training Program communication processes (both relational interventions), [32,33] checklists to verify important facts rather than assuming authoritative accuracy (a systems intervention), and critical language that enables all team members to speak up (an individual intervention), like the CUS mnemonic (CUS = I'm Concerned, I'm Uncomfortable, this is a Safety issue). [34] Concepts such as psychological safety [35] help support the development and evaluation of such interventions [36,37]. It is our hope that a focus on the power and role transcendence paradoxes, their respective barriers of uncertainty and risk, and the relational, individual, and systems levels will empower new ideas and interventions that significantly enhance the quality of interprofessional practice across health care settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%