2002
DOI: 10.1053/jinf.2002.0981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection as a Cause of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Children Younger than 3 Years of Age in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
11
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
8
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8%) and were previously healthy. This result is in agreement with those of several studies performed in the last few years in developed countries, reporting that low-risk infants account for between 75 and 98% of RSV-related hospitalizations [5,7,19,25]. Due to its high cost, palivizumab should not be used in the absence of risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…8%) and were previously healthy. This result is in agreement with those of several studies performed in the last few years in developed countries, reporting that low-risk infants account for between 75 and 98% of RSV-related hospitalizations [5,7,19,25]. Due to its high cost, palivizumab should not be used in the absence of risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The current data confirm the presence of RSV in 740 of the 1882 subjects (39.3%) with LRTI, while the previous 1983–1987 investigation of RSV infections identified 141 RSV‐positive cases (44.6%) among 316 inpatients with LRTI 2,12 . A group of Japanese authors found RSV as the cause of LRTI in 47.4% of the youngest patients (those <6 months of age), similar to the present findings 13 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…RSV is the most prevalent virus in children of this age in both developed and developing countries 62 63. In the present study, the highest number of positive cases among children younger than 6 months was for RSV (19 cases); however, this result was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%