2021
DOI: 10.1111/csp2.599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of COVID‐19 on wild meat trade in Nigerian markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a general consensus among bushmeat vendors from West Africa that the COVID-19 pandemic and related governmental measures had a negative impact on their activities, as translated into a decrease in number of clients. Although information on the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the bushmeat trade remains extremely scarce, governmental measures in Nigeria seem to have significantly decreased the volumes of bushmeat sold on the markets (Funk et al 2022). Such impact was still perceived as visible by most of the interviewed West African vendors after the end of governmental measures against the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was a general consensus among bushmeat vendors from West Africa that the COVID-19 pandemic and related governmental measures had a negative impact on their activities, as translated into a decrease in number of clients. Although information on the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the bushmeat trade remains extremely scarce, governmental measures in Nigeria seem to have significantly decreased the volumes of bushmeat sold on the markets (Funk et al 2022). Such impact was still perceived as visible by most of the interviewed West African vendors after the end of governmental measures against the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Because the latter remains a loosely controlled activity, such governmental measures were of various lengths and efficiency (Meseko et al 2020;Harvey-Carroll et al 2022), and of variable impact on the trade. For instance, they were reported to significantly decrease the bushmeat sale volumes in Nigeria (Funk et al 2022) and the pangolin trade in Liberia (Deemie et al 2021), whereas they did not seem to affect the pangolin trade in Cameroon (despite a specific ban on the species; Harvey-Carroll et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with our original expectation on the efficiency of governmental measures. A significant reduction in carcass numbers was also observed in Nigeria after lockdown (Funk et al, 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that African states can be efficient in mitigating the bushmeat trade when resources are duly mobilized, a notable point considering the ongoing bushmeat crisis and the zoonotic outbreaks to come (D'Cruze et al, 2020;Reynolds et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because the bushmeat trade is a poorly regulated, parallel economy across most of Africa, the genuine economic stakes behind the trade are poorly known (van Vliet et al, 2017). Moreover, the impact of bans on trade activities has rarely been quantified (but see Funk et al, 2022), notably in terms of post-ban recovery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With conservation efforts increasingly focused on urban consumption as one of the drivers of wildlife decline, it is important to determine how many people's livelihoods could potentially be impacted by attempts to reduce demand or increase law enforcement (Booth et al, 2021; Ingram, 2020). Wild meat demand reduction campaigns have recently been launched in a few Central African cities, including Kinshasa, and the COVID‐19 pandemic has also caused some people to think twice about eating wild meat due to heightened concerns over the disease risks (Funk et al, 2022; Li et al, in prep). It is therefore conceivable that some restaurateurs—almost exclusively women—could be negatively impacted by reduced wild meat sales as a result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%