Impact of COVID‐19 on wound care in Germany

Abstract

Recent studies showed that the COVID‐19 pandemic caused collateral damage in health care in terms of reduced hospital submissions or postponed treatment of other acute or chronic ill patients. An anonymous survey was sent out by mail to patients with chronic wounds in order to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on wound care. Sixty‐three patients returned the survey. In 14%, diagnostic workup or hospitalisation was cancelled or postponed. Thirty‐six percent could not seek consultation by their primary care physician as usual. The use of public transport or long travel time was not related to limited access to medical service ( P = .583). In ambulatory care, there was neither a significant difference in the frequency of changing wound dressings ( P = .67), nor in the person, who performed wound care ( P = .39). There were no significant changes in wound‐specific quality of life ( P = .505). No patient used telemedicine in order to avoid face‐to‐face contact or anticipate to pandemic‐related restrictions. The COVID‐19 pandemic impaired access to clinical management of chronic wounds in Germany. It had no significant impact on ambulatory care or wound‐related quality of life. Telemedicine still plays a negligible role in wound care.

Breakdown of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Care during the First Year of the Pandemic in Poland: A Retrospective National Cohort Study

“…Schlager et al reported that in Germany the pandemic has not had a significant negative impact on the quality of ambulatory care dedicated to patients with DFU ( n = 63) [ 30 ]. Unfortunately, the authors only assessed the soft endpoints, such as the quality of life and the frequency of changing wound dressing.…”

The legacy of the COVID‐19 pandemic and potential impact on persons with wounds

“…2. Resultant evolutionary not knee-jerk change 8 Understanding the complexity of swiftly evolving wound care practice in a peri-and post-pandemic world needs to be a priority to assess the consequences of COVID-19 as they develop. This should be undertaken to develop an evidence base and key principles for the rapid changes that are currently taking effect, and the serious implications for patients, families, and clinicians post-pandemic.…”

Atendimento à Pessoas com Feridas Crônicas Durante a Pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil

“…Além disso, 15,4% afirmaram que a úlcera piorou no que se refere ao aumento das dimensões, à profundidade, e ao exsudato 5 . Resultados diferentes foram obtidos no estudo da Alemanha, considerando que o atendimento ambulatorial presencial foi mantido no período de pandemia e não houve diferença significativa na frequência de troca de curativos (P= 0,67), nem na pessoa que realizou o cuidado da ferida (P= 0,39), inclusive não houve mudanças significativas na qualidade da ferida (P= 0,505) 10 .…”

“…A adaptação ao modelo remoto pode não ser fácil para muitos pacientes. Esta dificuldade ficou comprovada na Alemanha ao constatar que nenhum paciente com lesão usou telemedicina para evitar o contato presencial no período da pandemia 10 .…”