2019
DOI: 10.1002/cvj.12115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Selected Ethical Information Resources on Counselor Educators' Decision‐Making Regarding Boundary Crossings

Abstract: A random sample of 207 counselor educators used 4 ethical information resources in the context of 16 boundary-crossing scenarios. Burian and Slimp's (2000) social dual-role relationship model was the only resource to change counselor educators' boundary-crossing decision-making in a manner that could mitigate boundary-crossing concerns with students. Curiously, almost 60% of counselor educators stated that they would not use Burian and Slimp's model in the future when this was the only ethical decision-making … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, Rogers et al (2019) evaluated the process of how anxiety can influence cognitive distortions, contributing to increased difficulty in providing corrective feedback in clinical supervision. Burns (2019) and Burns and Cruikshanks (2019) assessed the efficacy of student and educator use of ethical decision‐making models to address boundary crossings and the willingness of both to use provided models in future decision‐making situations outside of the intervention simulation, finding that 47% of students and 60% of counselor educators stated an intention to use the models introduced during the intervention in the future.…”
Section: Professional Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Rogers et al (2019) evaluated the process of how anxiety can influence cognitive distortions, contributing to increased difficulty in providing corrective feedback in clinical supervision. Burns (2019) and Burns and Cruikshanks (2019) assessed the efficacy of student and educator use of ethical decision‐making models to address boundary crossings and the willingness of both to use provided models in future decision‐making situations outside of the intervention simulation, finding that 47% of students and 60% of counselor educators stated an intention to use the models introduced during the intervention in the future.…”
Section: Professional Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be helpful for CEs to understand how power differentials influence boundary-crossing perceptions within the legitimate hierarchy of counselor education. Burns and Cruikshanks (2019) and Burns (2019) used the same 16 boundarycrossing scenarios and the same four ethical-information resources with CEs and CESs to understand how these resources influenced each group when contemplating boundary-crossings with the other group. For this study, I used the ex-post facto data from both prior studies to test differences in original reactions on the 16 boundary-crossing scenarios between CEs and CESs.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burns (2019) stated counselor education students were individuals actively taking courses in a CACREP accredited master's graduate program. Burns and Cruikshanks (2019) and Burns (2019) performed power analyses with G*Power using a medium effect size of.25, power level of .80, and alpha of .05 (Faul et al, 2007), which recommended a minimum sample size of 136 for each study. Burns and Cruikshanks (2019) and Burns (2019) selected a medium effect size since average variance was expected and important, practical concerns for the counseling profession were desired (Healey & Hays, 2012).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations