2021
DOI: 10.1186/s41938-020-00347-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of silver nanoparticles and two biological treatments to control soft rot disease in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L)

Abstract: Background Soft rot disease caused by Pectobacterium carotovorum was observed in various crops which lead to yield shortages and economic losses. Main body Therefore, both in vitro and in vivo experiments, aim to assess the effect of nanoparticles and biological treatments to control soft rot disease in sugar beet plant. The treatments comprised three silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) concentrations (50, 75, and 100 ppm), three Spirulina platensis extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study showed that AgNPs have antibacterial and antifungal activity in vitro against R. solanacearum and F. oxysporum, respectively. This finding is consistent with previous studies, which showed that AgNPs are effective for killing phytopathogens (including fungi, Gram-positive bacteria, and Gram-negative bacteria) ( Table 1 ) [ 23 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Not all of them have carried out a basic characterization of the biogenic AgNPs obtained, which makes it difficult to explain the mechanism by which AgNPs interact with these microorganisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the present study showed that AgNPs have antibacterial and antifungal activity in vitro against R. solanacearum and F. oxysporum, respectively. This finding is consistent with previous studies, which showed that AgNPs are effective for killing phytopathogens (including fungi, Gram-positive bacteria, and Gram-negative bacteria) ( Table 1 ) [ 23 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Not all of them have carried out a basic characterization of the biogenic AgNPs obtained, which makes it difficult to explain the mechanism by which AgNPs interact with these microorganisms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Figure 6 c shows fungal mycelium in potato dextrose medium (control without AgNPs) and Figure 6 d shows fungal mycelium treated with 100 µg/mL AgNPs. Similar work has been reported by Khan et al, as well as Ghazy et al, in which antifungal activities of the AgNPs were observed [ 23 , 35 ]. The SEM analysis ( Figure 6 e) of the treated F. oxysporum was used to observe the morphological changes on the surface of the mycelium treated with AgNPs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the present study showed that AgNPs have antibacterial and antifungal activity in vitro. This finding is consistent with previous studies, which showed that AgNPs are effective for killing microorganisms (including Gram‐positive bacteria, Gram‐negative bacteria, and fungi) [34]. A marine actinobacteria N. dassonvillei ‐DS013 showed excellent antibacterial activity against the various selected clinical isolates of bacteria such as E. coli , Enterococcus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Klebsiella sp., Proteus sp., Shigella sp., B. subtilis , and Streptococcus sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%