Impact of Societal Culture on Covid-19 Morbidity and Mortality across Countries

Abstract

Researchers have begun exploring the impact of societal culture on Covid-19 outcomes (morbidity and mortality). However, emerging findings need integration with prior literature on societal culture and infectious diseases. Moreover, accumulation of knowledge warrants an update while overcoming certain limitations of samples as well as construct validity concerns. Accordingly, hypotheses are derived based on extant evidence proposing the impact of certain cultural practices on Covid-19 outcomes across countries. These hypotheses are tested using the cultural practice scores from GLOBE studies after controlling for certain covariates identified in literature. Multiple regression results reveal that societal culture significantly explains Covid-19 outcomes beyond the explanation due to control variables. Specifically, power distance and institutional collectivism show negative association with both Covid-19 morbidity and mortality. Additionally, performance orientation shows negative association with Covid-19 morbidity. It appears that power distance may ensure conformity to prescribed behaviors and features of performance orientation may facilitate swift and effective containment of Covid-19 cases. The significance of institutional collectivism—but not in-group collectivism—emerging as the form of collectivism showing negative association with Covid-19 outcomes is also discussed.

How Do National Cultures Affect Quality of Life in Europe During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

“…However, this research differs from others; for example, Huynh (2020) [69] found that a country with a higher uncertainty avoidance index from the Hofstede (2001) dimension made people strictly follow the rules by avoiding gathering in public areas or strictly complying with swift quarantine measures and effective containment of COVID-19 cases (Kumar, 2021) [70]. Countries with high levels of uncertainty avoidance have the ability to control the spread of the epidemic better than a country with low levels of uncertainty avoidance because people have more "tolerance" (Mattaa et al, 2021) [71].…”

Mobility patterns and COVID growth: Moderating role of country culture

“…Different countries have reacted and responded to the ongoing COVID-19 situation differently ( Babu et al, 2021 , Ihekweazu and Agogo, 2020 , Oh et al, 2020 ). This has attracted researchers to explore the impact of culture on COVID-19 growth ( Gokmen et al, 2021 , Kumar, 2021 , Ibanez and Gyanendra Singh, 2020 ). The researches have established significant direct impact of cultural factors on COVID-19 growth.…”

International psychological research addressing the early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic: A rapid scoping review and implications for global psychology

“…Third, surprisingly few studies explicitly focused on culture and measured cultural dimensions. We have to consider that we only included research referring to the early phase of the pandemic and it seems likely that such culture‐focused research might be more feasible in later than in very early phases of such a pandemic (e.g., as it relies on international data on the pandemic itself, involving a larger number of countries and thus from later stages of the pandemic, e.g., Gelfand et al, 2021; Kumar, 2021). This signals a potential issue related to a time lag between the outbreak of major global health crises (and the need for immediate international research evidence) and first empirical cross‐cultural research evidence addressing the role of culture in this early phase.…”