“…The similar energy position of the absorption edge of the Mo‐doped sample with MoO 2 reference confirmed the dominant Mo 4+ valence state in Fe 2.93 ▫ 0.017 Mo 0.053 O 4 . [
37,49 ] Thus, the lattice enlargement in the Rietveld refinement was undoubtedly explained by the larger Mo 4+ ions (
Å [
50 ] versus
Å [
39 ] ). [
51 ] Moreover, the absence of the pre‐peak indicated that Mo preferred to occupy at the 16 d sites with higher O h symmetries than 8 a sites with T d symmetries, [
52 ] which was consistent with DFT results.…”