2019
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of stent generation on 2‐year clinical outcomes in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease who underwent culprit‐only or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract: AbstractsBackground: Data concerning the impact of stent generation on long-term outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease (MVD) who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with culprit-only PCI (C-PCI) or multivessel PCI (M-PCI) are limited.Methods: A total of 7,266 patients were separated into the two groups, a C-PCI (n = 4,901) or M-PCI group (n = 2,365). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These PCIs are possibly included as non-TVR in the culprit-only PCI group in this study. 39 However, in this KAMIR, this parameter was not included as a variable. Therefore, unfortunately, the accurate number of these PCIs could not be provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These PCIs are possibly included as non-TVR in the culprit-only PCI group in this study. 39 However, in this KAMIR, this parameter was not included as a variable. Therefore, unfortunately, the accurate number of these PCIs could not be provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, these results were comparable with our published results. 39,40 Therefore, regarding this higher cumulative incidence of non-TVR, multivessel PCI could be preferred than culprit-only PCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any repeat revascularization included target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and non-TVR. The de nitions of successful PCI, complete or incomplete revascularization, Re-MI, TLR, TVR, and non-TVR were also previously reported [16,17].…”
Section: Study De Nitions and Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…After IPTW, at three [10]. However, in the case of AMI, there are still many challenges, and there are various opinions on the choice of DES [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%