2020
DOI: 10.1111/echo.14645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the 2016 ASE/EACVI Guidelines on diastolic function reporting in routine clinical practice

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the impact of 2016 ASE/EACVI guidelines on Diastolic Function (DF) reporting during routine clinical practice. Methods: Transthoracic echos performed 9 months before and 18 months after the 2016 guidelines (DF2016) were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Twenty thousand eight hundred forty three echos performed between July 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017, were analyzed. Quarterly trends showed a stable proportion of normal DF (nDF), diastolic dysfunction (DD), indeterminate DF (DF-I),an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, they concluded that the application of the new recommendations resulted in a much lower prevalence of LVDD and that the concordance between the classifications was poor. In a recent study by Gopalakrishnan et al, that also followed the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations and was based on more than 20,000 echocardiograms from a single-center, it was demonstrated that there was a 57% decrease in reporting of diastolic dysfunction (p<0.001), grade 1 LVDD decreased by 64% (P < 0.001), grade 2 LVDD decreased by 51% (P <0.001), and grade 3 LVDD did not change significantly (P =0.18) [11]. Hence, diastolic function studies published before the release of the 2016 recommendations present miscellaneous non-standardized results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, they concluded that the application of the new recommendations resulted in a much lower prevalence of LVDD and that the concordance between the classifications was poor. In a recent study by Gopalakrishnan et al, that also followed the 2016 ASE/EACVI recommendations and was based on more than 20,000 echocardiograms from a single-center, it was demonstrated that there was a 57% decrease in reporting of diastolic dysfunction (p<0.001), grade 1 LVDD decreased by 64% (P < 0.001), grade 2 LVDD decreased by 51% (P <0.001), and grade 3 LVDD did not change significantly (P =0.18) [11]. Hence, diastolic function studies published before the release of the 2016 recommendations present miscellaneous non-standardized results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, larger LA volumes and lower strain and LA EF were independent predictors of AF development in recent studies [ 4 , 5 ], including sub-clinical AF [ 6 ]. LA function may improve the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of diastolic dysfunction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [ 7 ]. LA evaluation plays an important role in imaging of AF, stroke risk related to AF, and diastolic dysfunction evaluation [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%