2001
DOI: 10.1002/pds.603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Minimum Pricing Policy and introduction of brand (generic) substitution into the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in Australia

Abstract: The introduction in 1990 of the Minimum Pricing Policy without allowing generic substitution had a relatively small impact on the selection of medicines within the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. However the effect of generic substitution at the pharmacist level, which was introduced in December 1994, resulted in a marked increase in the percentage of eligible PBS items dispensed at benchmark. Case studies showed a larger premium resulted in a greater shift of patients from drugs with a brand premium to the be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Globally, generic medicines are effective in treating many of today's ailments and their use contributes to substantial savings in medicines expenditure (Andersson et al 2007;Fischer and Avorn 2004;King and Kanavos 2002). Consequently, a generic substitution policy that aims to encourage the utilization of generic medicines has been legislated in various developed (Heikkila et al 2007;McManus et al 2001;Simoens and De Coster 2006;Simoens 2009) and developing countries (Gossell-Williams 2007;Homedes and Ugalde 2005;NAPM 2009). This policy allows pharmacists to substitute brand name medicines with bioequivalent generics, provided if allowed by the prescribing physicians and consented to by the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, generic medicines are effective in treating many of today's ailments and their use contributes to substantial savings in medicines expenditure (Andersson et al 2007;Fischer and Avorn 2004;King and Kanavos 2002). Consequently, a generic substitution policy that aims to encourage the utilization of generic medicines has been legislated in various developed (Heikkila et al 2007;McManus et al 2001;Simoens and De Coster 2006;Simoens 2009) and developing countries (Gossell-Williams 2007;Homedes and Ugalde 2005;NAPM 2009). This policy allows pharmacists to substitute brand name medicines with bioequivalent generics, provided if allowed by the prescribing physicians and consented to by the patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that one of the stated policy aims of government is to increase generic competition as a way of decreasing pharmaceutical prices, 14 it is important not to assume that this effect is realised without question. The average effect of a 0.4-1% price reduction per generic seller as suggested by these results on the overall PBS budget may provide significant budget savings, although the estimation of the magnitude of this effect is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13] As such, it is timely to assess the relative success or otherwise of pricing policies over time. The 'Minimum Pricing Policy' 14 , introduced in December 1990, had little impact in increasing price competition between generic manufacturers until the subsequent generic or 'Brand Substitution Policy' was introduced in 1994. 14 The latter allowed pharmacists to substitute between interchangeable brands of the same medication (with consumer and prescriber consent).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Die Substitution von Spezialitäten durch generische Medikamente wird in manchen Ländern bei der Medikamentenabgabe beeinflusst [3,4]. Dieser Mechanismus beschränkt ÄrztInnen bei der Verordnung spezifischer Produkte.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified