2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the Topology of Global Macroeconomic Network on the Spreading of Economic Crises

Abstract: Throughout economic history, the global economy has experienced recurring crises. The persistent recurrence of such economic crises calls for an understanding of their generic features rather than treating them as singular events. The global economic system is a highly complex system and can best be viewed in terms of a network of interacting macroeconomic agents. In this regard, from the perspective of collective network dynamics, here we explore how the topology of the global macroeconomic network affects th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions are that small world or scale-free networks are, in general, more robust to cascades (the propagation of shocks) than random networks, but they are also more prone to propagations of crises if the most central nodes (usually, the ones with more connections) are not themselves backed by sufficient funds. Most empirical works [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] are also based on the structure derived from the borrowing and lending between banks, and they show that those networks exhibit a core-periphery structure, with few banks occupying central, more connected positions, and others populating a less connected neighborhood. Those articles showed that this structure may also lead to cascades if the core banks are not sufficiently resistant, and that the network structures changed considerably after the crisis of 2008, with a reduction on the number of connected banks and a more robust topology against the propagation of shocks.…”
Section: Propagation Of Socks In Financial Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions are that small world or scale-free networks are, in general, more robust to cascades (the propagation of shocks) than random networks, but they are also more prone to propagations of crises if the most central nodes (usually, the ones with more connections) are not themselves backed by sufficient funds. Most empirical works [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] are also based on the structure derived from the borrowing and lending between banks, and they show that those networks exhibit a core-periphery structure, with few banks occupying central, more connected positions, and others populating a less connected neighborhood. Those articles showed that this structure may also lead to cascades if the core banks are not sufficiently resistant, and that the network structures changed considerably after the crisis of 2008, with a reduction on the number of connected banks and a more robust topology against the propagation of shocks.…”
Section: Propagation Of Socks In Financial Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When such a quantity reaches a threshold value, the vertex becomes "bankrupt" and passes its distress to the neighbours. Similarly to previous studies [27][28][29] we set the failure threshold equal to the degree k of vertex. The simulation time is discrete and at every step we add a grain of sand (distress) on a randomly drawn vertex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es fundamental que a corto, medio y largo plazo se definan con mayor atención las acciones a tomar por los pueblos del mundo y sus gobiernos, o al menos la mayor parte de las regiones de este sobre la crisis macroeconómica por la que están atravesando el planeta, ya que precisamente esa insistente postura globalizadora hace que también sea de orden laboral, ambiental, alimentaria, energética y política, en el que un relevante indicador del dominio y control de estas sea el trabajo en condiciones de empleo justo y decente, con su poder para generar igualdad y bienestar social (4,(25)(26)(27)(28) .…”
Section: Conclusiónunclassified