2020
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2020.3026975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of UAV Wobbling on the Air-to-Ground Wireless Channel

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extensive measurements in [36] and [37] show that the AG link can be modeled as a frequency-selective Rician fading channel with a K factor that ranges from 2 to 20 dB. The channel ordering is assumed to remain fixed for the coherence time of the channel, which can be more than 5 ms [38], which allows a reasonable CSI exchange frequency.…”
Section: System and Channel Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extensive measurements in [36] and [37] show that the AG link can be modeled as a frequency-selective Rician fading channel with a K factor that ranges from 2 to 20 dB. The channel ordering is assumed to remain fixed for the coherence time of the channel, which can be more than 5 ms [38], which allows a reasonable CSI exchange frequency.…”
Section: System and Channel Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the average BER of the two users in N = 2 system over Rician channel, (37) and (38) are utilized as follows:…”
Section: Appendix Average Ber Over Rician Fading Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, UAVs are typically moving causing fast variation to the channel phase, which complicates the overall phase processing. Channel variations are expected even when the UAV is hovering due to the UAV wobbling [40], and thus, the coherence time of the channel will be generally short. Therefore, the IRS might be provided with outdated phase information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although estimation of wind disturbances has been extensively studied in flight control to mitigate wind effect [8], [9], UAV jitter/vibration, i.e., the unintended high-frequency change of UAV attitude, is still non-negligible, especially for multi-rotor UAVs. For wireless communication system deployed in UAV platform, jittering effects could severely deteriorate the quality of wireless channel when carrier frequency is high, as the path variation caused by UAV jitter is significant compared with the wavelength [10]. However, current studies on UAV channel mainly focus on propagation attenuation, shadowing, root mean square (RMS) delay spread (DS), over lower frequency band, typically ranging from 0.8 GHz to 8 GHz [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wireless communication system deployed in UAV platform, jittering effects could severely deteriorate the quality of wireless channel when carrier frequency is high, as the path variation caused by UAV jitter is significant compared with the wavelength [10]. However, current studies on UAV channel mainly focus on propagation attenuation, shadowing, root mean square (RMS) delay spread (DS), over lower frequency band, typically ranging from 0.8 GHz to 8 GHz [10], [11]. Since beamforming is the enabling technique for mmWave communications, spatial domain parameters, e.g., AoA and AoD, are more worthy of study than the aforementioned channel parameters in mmWave band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%