2021
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202100112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes

Abstract: This article has earned an open data badge "Reproducible Research" for making publicly available the code necessary to reproduce the reported results. The results reported in this article could fully be reproduced.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we have assumed that the clusterperiod sizes are identical across clusters and time periods and have not yet enabled power calculation with unequal cluster-period sizes. Unequal cluster-period sizes may be more common in cross-sectional designs, and recent studies showed that varying cluster sizes had a larger impact on statistical power for independence GEE estimators compared with GEE estimators with the correct multilevel correlation structure in SWCRTs (Tian et al 2022). Future versions of our software would consider extensions to unequal cluster-period sizes, based on the efficient Monte Carlo method in Tian et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Second, we have assumed that the clusterperiod sizes are identical across clusters and time periods and have not yet enabled power calculation with unequal cluster-period sizes. Unequal cluster-period sizes may be more common in cross-sectional designs, and recent studies showed that varying cluster sizes had a larger impact on statistical power for independence GEE estimators compared with GEE estimators with the correct multilevel correlation structure in SWCRTs (Tian et al 2022). Future versions of our software would consider extensions to unequal cluster-period sizes, based on the efficient Monte Carlo method in Tian et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unequal cluster-period sizes may be more common in cross-sectional designs, and recent studies showed that varying cluster sizes had a larger impact on statistical power for independence GEE estimators compared with GEE estimators with the correct multilevel correlation structure in SWCRTs (Tian et al 2022). Future versions of our software would consider extensions to unequal cluster-period sizes, based on the efficient Monte Carlo method in Tian et al (2022). Finally, we have considered only a complete design where data collection is planned for all cluster periods (Hemming, Lilford, and Girling 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another advantage in using GEE for CRTs is that the estimation of mean model parameters is robust to misspecification of correlation structures in large samples. However, the specification of working independence correlation structure may result in efficiency loss that can be substantial when the cluster-period sizes are not all equal [Tian et al, 2021]. Furthermore, an over-simplified exchangeable correlation structure may give inaccurate power calculations when there is correlation decay in multi-period CRTs [Li, 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%