Impact of Variation in Pause Time and Network Load in AODV and AOMDV Protocols

Periyasamy, P.; Karthikeyan, E.

doi:10.5815/ijitcs.2012.03.06

Cited by 10 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In paper [3] they discuss about MDART, AOMDV, AODV and DSR routing protocol according to connection type NODE-UDP. In paper [4] they used connection type CBR traffic under RWM. They compared AODV and AOMDV routing protocol in terms of variation in pause time.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analysis of AOMDV, AODV, DSR, and DSDV Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Network

Paul

Bhuiyan

Fatema

et al. 2014

2014 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In wireless sensor network (WSN), data collecting from the environment and sending that data to be processed and evaluated is the most important issues. Hence performance evaluation and comparison between routing protocols is required because performance of any routing protocol can be changed or very with various parameters such as speed, seed time, pause time, number of node, and traffic scenario (network topology). In this paper routing protocol AODV, AOMDV, DSR and DSDV has been analyzed by comparing the different performance matrices such as packet delivery ratio (PDR), loss packet ratio (LPR), and average end to end delay (Average End to End) with varying pause time and number of node under TCP & CBR connection via network simulator NS2.35 for wireless sensor network.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…RELATED WORK There are several papers [2,3,4,5] related to WSN performance evaluation of AOMDV, AODV, DSR, DSDV. In paper [2] they analysis performance of WSN according to End-to-End delay, Number of packet received, Packet drop ratio and Energy consumption of the Network.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of AOMDV, AODV, DSR, and DSDV Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Network

Paul

Bhuiyan

Fatema

et al. 2014

2014 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To evaluate and compare the performance of the Transport Layer Protocols, three different quantitative metrics have been used. They are: 1) Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR): PDR is the ratio of data packets delivered to the destination to those generated by the sources and is calculated as follows [18]: 3) Average End to End (E2E) Delay: Average End-to-End delay is the average time of the data packet to be successfully transmitted across a MANET from source to destination. It includes all possible delays such as buffering during the route discovery latency, queuing at the interface queue, retransmission delay at the MAC (Medium Access Control), the propagation and the transfer time, processing time at Transport Layer [18].…”

Section: Performance Metricsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Analysis of Transport Layer Protocols under Diverse Traffics in Mobile WiMAX Network using NS2 with Improved Scene Generator

Salehin¹,

Afroz²

2020

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) is a Metropolitan Area Network (MAN) wireless technology that provides broadband Internet access to both fixed and mobile users. Due to limited radio propagation range of wireless mobile devices and variable and unpredictable characteristics of wireless communication medium, there are certainly some effects of the speed of mobiles, and the amount of reliability provided by the underlying Transport Layer on the network performance. In this study, simulation of WiMAX networks is performed using Network Simulator 2 (NS2) to investigate the effects of Maximum Velocity and Pause Time of Mobile Stations and a comparative performance analysis of two commonly used Transport Layer Protocols, namely, Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP), is also conducted. TCP variant New Reno is used. For more realistic simulation, NS2 scene generation script is modified. Experiments demonstrate that performance of a WiMAX network is relatively stable when TCP is used. TCP shows overall better performance, especially in case of Packet Delivery Ratio and Average End to End Delay, while throughputs are almost similar for both the protocols, which prefers the use of TCP over UDP in mobile WiMAX networks for all applications.

show abstract

“…4) Average End to End (E2E) Delay: Average End-to-End delay is the average time of the data packet to be successfully transmitted across a MANET from source to destination. It includes all possible delays such as buffering during the route discovery latency, queuing at the interface queue, retransmission delay at the MAC (Medium Access Control), the propagation and the transfer time, processing time at Transport Layer [26]. The average e2e delay is computed by,…”

Section: Performance Metrics For Making Comparisonmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Performance Analysis of DSDV, DSR and OLSR Routing Protocols to Determine the Best Suited Routing Approach through Simulation in Mobile Wimax Network

Soheli¹,

Salehin²,

Nila³

et al. 2019

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX) is one of the most efficient and well known area based networking system that provide fixed, and more newly, mobile broadband connectivity between fixed and mobile network access in a define coverage areas. There are a large number of research works that have been conducted to measure the performance of WiMAX network using different ad-hoc routing protocols. Most of them are concerned only about the protocols and how they work in WiMAX networks. There are no such comparisons purely based on the nature of protocols, whether they are reactive or proactive, or distance vector or link state. If the most suited approach of routing can be determined, research area can be narrowed to that particular approach. In this paper, four different protocols are taken, namely, Destination Sequence Distance Vector (DSDV) routing protocol, which is a proactive distance vector routing protocol; Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), which is a reactive distance vector protocol; Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR), which is a proactive link state routing protocol. For simulation of WiMAX network, Network Simulator-3 (NS-3) simulation software in Linux environment is used. For measuring and comparing performances of the protocols, primarily Packet Delivery Ratio, Throughput, End-to-End Delay, Normalized Routing overhead, Number of dropped data packets have been used. Results of simulation shows that, OLSR, as well as, Proactive Link State routing approach outperform other two approaches in simulated WiMAX network. Then also tried to improve the performance of WiMAX by analyzing the network with and without mobility.

show abstract

Impact of Variation in Pause Time and Network Load in AODV and AOMDV Protocols

Cited by 10 publications

References 5 publications

Analysis of AOMDV, AODV, DSR, and DSDV Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Network

Analysis of AOMDV, AODV, DSR, and DSDV Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Network

Comparative Analysis of Transport Layer Protocols under Diverse Traffics in Mobile WiMAX Network using NS2 with Improved Scene Generator

Comparative Performance Analysis of DSDV, DSR and OLSR Routing Protocols to Determine the Best Suited Routing Approach through Simulation in Mobile Wimax Network

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About