2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of varying irradiance on vegetation indices and chlorophyll fluorescence derived from spectroscopy data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the combination of forest structural variables and sun illumination causes specific patterns of cast shadow. These illumination effects often persist after atmospheric compensation, particularly for heterogeneous surfaces measured in high spatial resolution [119]. These processing artifacts eventually translate into optical indices derived and allow relating them with canopy structural variables as shown with our results.…”
Section: Reliability Of Structural Parameter Retrieval From Apex Datasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In addition, the combination of forest structural variables and sun illumination causes specific patterns of cast shadow. These illumination effects often persist after atmospheric compensation, particularly for heterogeneous surfaces measured in high spatial resolution [119]. These processing artifacts eventually translate into optical indices derived and allow relating them with canopy structural variables as shown with our results.…”
Section: Reliability Of Structural Parameter Retrieval From Apex Datasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Inasmuch as PRI of natural canopies is particularly sensitive to directional irradiance [64], our results suggest that shifts in carotenoid contents are responsible for the variation in the PRI-LUE relationship when PRI is measured at viewing angles close to the nadir in the field [16]. A similar mechanism can be responsible for increased PRI-LUE correlations for observations from satellites at higher viewing angles from the zenith [65].…”
Section: Use Of Pri For Determining Photosynthetic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The importance and success of the red fluorescence variables, as compared to the far-red fluorescence, is supported by several published radiative transfer modeling efforts and current state-of-the-art fluorescence models [57][58][59][60][61][62]. These papers demonstrate that the red fluorescence is more sensitive to vegetation physiological variables than the far-red fluorescence and is potentially retrievable from satellite orbit [63].…”
Section: Far-red Vs Red Fluorescence Radiancesmentioning
confidence: 91%