2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of wall heat transfer in Large Eddy Simulation of flame dynamics in a swirled combustion chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows a sketch of the computational domain and mesh topology. Our mesh has comparable resolution as the optimized one from Agostinelli et al 38 used at the same case showing very good reproduction 36 of the experimental data. A further refinement of up to 0.25 mm in the flame zone could not improve the overall flame shape, heat release and dynamic behavior noticeably.…”
Section: Meshmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 5 shows a sketch of the computational domain and mesh topology. Our mesh has comparable resolution as the optimized one from Agostinelli et al 38 used at the same case showing very good reproduction 36 of the experimental data. A further refinement of up to 0.25 mm in the flame zone could not improve the overall flame shape, heat release and dynamic behavior noticeably.…”
Section: Meshmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For this case the swirler produces most of the turbulence and a turbulent inflow model is not required. All walls are assumed isothermal and are set to mean values from Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT) simulation 36 . Applying CHT would be the more robust and general approach but we assume the heat loss modeling to be good enough considering the other uncertainties.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Large-eddy simulation provides reliable predication of turbulent mixing and combustion for swirl burners [11,12]. However, for the purpose of optimization, prompt simulation of fuel mixing and burning in large-scale furnaces and gas turbine combustors at realistic flow rates still often relies on the use of Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods and requires experimental validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, compared to models that compute chemistry explicitly (not necessarily refer to computing chemistry using resolved quantities known as no model or quasi-laminar chemistry, but also in thickened flame and partially stirred reactor models, where local temperature and pressure effects are inherently considered in reaction rate closure), tabulation models require additional non-trivial modelling treatment to account for heat loss effects, which were shown to have a strong impact on the FTF/FDF 12 . More recent studies by Kraus et al 17 and Agostinelli et al 18 employed advanced conjugated heat transfer method to account for the two-way coupling between the flame LES and burner walls. They showed that the heat loss effects are important for the swirl burners considered and need to be taken into account in the LES in order to correctly capture the thermoacoustic instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%