2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12288-019-01202-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Criteria-2016 on the Diagnosis of Polycythemia Vera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first focus point of discussion on the updated diagnostic criteria in 2016 is the lowering cutoff value in Hct and Hb for a major criterion 11 . A strong relationship between Hct and Hb levels and PV diagnosis has been debated in the literature 8,[12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first focus point of discussion on the updated diagnostic criteria in 2016 is the lowering cutoff value in Hct and Hb for a major criterion 11 . A strong relationship between Hct and Hb levels and PV diagnosis has been debated in the literature 8,[12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most crucial aspect of the updated criteria in 2016 was to identify masked and clinically suspected cases 10,12 . Changing Hct and Hb thresholds in 2016 made some changes and was shown in a study to cause a 36% increase in the diagnosis of PV over the 2008 version 11 . In a study in which 2,056 suspected MPN patients were evaluated, 132 patients were diagnosed with the WHO 2008 criteria, while 154 patients were diagnosed with the WHO 2016 criteria 10 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%