2001
DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.9830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaction technique and graft treatment in revisions of the femoral component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The first step of freeze-dried bone process is the removal of bone marrow and cell remains by solvent-detergent (Delloye et al 1987). Many authors have reported an improvement in implant stability in femoral and acetabular impactions using a morselized graft that had been simply washed with saline (Kärrholm et al 1999, Ullmark 2000, Höstner et al 2001. In clinical studies, good results have also been reported using defatted freeze-dried bone (Mazhar et al 2001, de Roeck and Drabu 2001, Thien et al 2001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first step of freeze-dried bone process is the removal of bone marrow and cell remains by solvent-detergent (Delloye et al 1987). Many authors have reported an improvement in implant stability in femoral and acetabular impactions using a morselized graft that had been simply washed with saline (Kärrholm et al 1999, Ullmark 2000, Höstner et al 2001. In clinical studies, good results have also been reported using defatted freeze-dried bone (Mazhar et al 2001, de Roeck and Drabu 2001, Thien et al 2001.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two hypotheses were advanced to support this observation. First, the replacement of viscous bone marrow by saline in the freeze-dried bone might accelerate the compaction of the grafts (Höstner et al 2001). Secondly, the embrittlement due to bone processing (Cornu et al 2000) could be of value in impaction bone grafting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our impaction technique corresponded to the one described by Gie et al (1993), except for the use of polished rotating reamers during the initial phase of impaction in 24 cases (11 S, 13 C) (Höstner et al 2001). In 2 cases (control group), whether this technique or the conventional technique was used had not been recorded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The treatment has been described using extensively coated femoral stems [3,13,26], modular stems with distal tapers [10,12,14,15,17,19,22], and impaction bone grafting with cemented polished stems [4,7,16,21,23,25,27]. Femoral impaction grafting, first reported by Gie et al in 1993 [5], has the advantage of adding bone to the deficient femur, but it is a time-consuming procedure with reported risks of fracture ranging from 5% to 12% [1,5,7,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%