2020
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of artificial barriers on the connectivity and dispersal of vascular macrophytes in rivers: A critical review

Abstract: 1. Macrophytes play important functional roles in river ecosystems, providing habitat and food, as well as influencing flow, water chemistry, and sediment dynamics.They also represent an important component of river biodiversity.2. Artificial river barriers have the potential to disrupt macrophyte dispersal, and compromise their distribution and persistence, but little information is available compared to barrier impacts on fish and macroinvertebrates. Here, we review the mechanisms supporting dispersal of riv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(265 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, our results support the idea that barrier impacts need to be viewed beyond their effects on migratory fish (Ogbeibu & Oribhabor, 2002;Fuller et al, 2015;Jones et al, 2020b), by showing their potential for causing far-reaching impacts on river-resident fish too (Weibel & Peter, 2013). Given the abundance of small barriers in rivers worldwide (Jones et al, 2019;Belletti et al, 2020), it is important to evaluate their more subtle effects to fully understand the extent and consequences of river fragmentation.…”
Section: Accepted Articlesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Overall, our results support the idea that barrier impacts need to be viewed beyond their effects on migratory fish (Ogbeibu & Oribhabor, 2002;Fuller et al, 2015;Jones et al, 2020b), by showing their potential for causing far-reaching impacts on river-resident fish too (Weibel & Peter, 2013). Given the abundance of small barriers in rivers worldwide (Jones et al, 2019;Belletti et al, 2020), it is important to evaluate their more subtle effects to fully understand the extent and consequences of river fragmentation.…”
Section: Accepted Articlesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…2 provides an example of the restoration of a river's natural flow and sediment regime through dam removal, describing the consequences for key ecosystem functions in headwater, main channel and floodplain habitats. Rewilding outcomes by restoration of flows and habitat connectivity could include increased viability of river-edge egg-laying insects in hydropeaking headwater reaches (secondary production; Palmer and Ruhi 2019), improved dispersal of macrophyte propagules in the main channel, promoting primary production (Jones et al 2020), as well as deposition and transport of organic matter into floodplains (decomposition; Langhans and Tockner 2006). Similarly, biotic components in river ecosystems show spatio-temporally varying responses to the restoration of the flow regime.…”
Section: Developing a Systematic Framework To Support River Rewildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no true riparian vegetation recorded in any of the catchments, although fringing emergent taxa such as rushes were present around Stockton and Black Diamond A (both < 20% of the lake edge) and Lake Kepwari (a few patches). The presence of fringing vegetation in Lake Kepwari was likely due to entry of propagules during the river breach in 2011 and later flow-through trial (see Jones et al 2020).…”
Section: Stage 1: Catchment Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%