2014
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12256
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of breeder loss on social structure, reproduction and population growth in a social canid

Abstract: Summary1. The importance of individuals to the dynamics of populations may depend on reproductive status, especially for species with complex social structure. Loss of reproductive individuals in socially complex species could disproportionately affect population dynamics by destabilizing social structure and reducing population growth. Alternatively, compensatory mechanisms such as rapid replacement of breeders may result in little disruption. The impact of breeder loss on the population dynamics of social sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
108
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Selective removal of individuals may change aspects of social organization and dispersal rates (Milner et al 2007;Allendorf and Hard 2009;Averbeck et al 2010;Borg et al 2015, Leclerc et al 2017, while hunting disturbance can induce escape movements and temporary home range displacement (Kamei et al 2010;Grignolio et al 2011;Thurfjell et al 2013;Jarnemo and Wikenros 2014). In the case of wild boar, repeated hunting disturbance may affect social structure, leading to an increase in fission-fusion dynamics in the population, potentially facilitating the spread of diseases (Iacolina et al 2009;Scillitani et al 2010;Saïd et al 2012).…”
Section: Hunting and Disease Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective removal of individuals may change aspects of social organization and dispersal rates (Milner et al 2007;Allendorf and Hard 2009;Averbeck et al 2010;Borg et al 2015, Leclerc et al 2017, while hunting disturbance can induce escape movements and temporary home range displacement (Kamei et al 2010;Grignolio et al 2011;Thurfjell et al 2013;Jarnemo and Wikenros 2014). In the case of wild boar, repeated hunting disturbance may affect social structure, leading to an increase in fission-fusion dynamics in the population, potentially facilitating the spread of diseases (Iacolina et al 2009;Scillitani et al 2010;Saïd et al 2012).…”
Section: Hunting and Disease Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, transient individuals are known to exist in coyote [3133], eastern wolf [17], and gray wolf [3437] populations, but their ability to traverse expansive areas makes transients difficult to monitor and study without global positioning system (GPS) and satellite technology [33]. Despite these difficulties, transiency is recognized to have a functional role in the population dynamics of wolves through emigration and replacement of breeding residents lost to mortality [3,1213,15,36]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we acknowledge that predation also impose indirect effects on prey populations (Creel and Christianson, 2008), typically related to predator avoidance behaviour or the disruption of social structures (Lima, 1998;Borg, Brainerd, Meier and Prugh, 2015). The demographic consequences of indirect effects of predation may be substantial, and there is mounting evidence that such indirect effects of hunting may be common for some species (Swenson et al, 1997;Whitman, Starfield, Quadling, and Packer, 2004;Maldonado-Chaparro and Blumstein, 2008;Creel and Rotella, 2010;Borg et al, 2015). We therefore suggest that in addition to an increased attention to the predation strategies exhibited by human hunters, there may be an equivalent need to improve our knowledge about the indirect demographic consequences of hunting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%