Impacts of Chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Receptor 2 C1208T Polymorphism on Cancer Susceptibility

Abstract

Background. The CXC chemokines belong to a unique family of cytokines that participates in the progression and development of many malignant tumors. Evidence for the relationship between chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 (CXCR2) C1208T polymorphism and susceptibility to cancer remains inconsistent. Methods. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and combined analysis were used to investigate the effect of CXCR2 variation on cancer risk. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were also used to evaluate the expression of CXCR2 in prostate cancer (PCA). Results. Across 11 case-control studies, 4,909 cases and 5,884 controls were involved in the current analysis. Individuals with a TT genotype were associated with increased risk of digestive cancer, compared to those with a TC+CC genotype ( OR = 1.16 , 95 % CI = 1.02 -1.31, P = 0.025 ). Individuals carrying the TT genotype had a 39% higher risk of urinary cancer than those carrying CC genotype ( OR = 1.39 , 95 % CI = 1.04 -1.87, P = 0.025 ). Individuals with a TT genotype showed a 56% augmented breast cancer risk, compared to those with a CC genotype ( OR = 1.56 , 95 % CI = 1.03 -2.35, P = 0.034 ). It was found that CXCR2 expression was downregulated in PCA. Compared with PCA subjects carrying the CC genotype, the expression of CXCR2 was decreased in patients with the TT genotype. Conclusions. The CXCR2 C1208T variation was associated with elevated risk of urinary, breast, and digestive cancer. However, the C1208T polymorphism was correlated with attenuated risk of lung cancer.

Association between IL8RB C1208T mutation and risk of cancer

“…One possible reason might be that most of the authors who performed the pooled analysis were from Asian countries. They tended to publish positive results related to their own ethnicity [50–53] . Moreover, the number of studies based on African populations included in current analysis was fairly few.…”

“…They tended to publish positive results related to their own ethnicity. [50][51][52][53] Moreover, the number of studies based on African populations included in current analysis was fairly few. Different conclusions may be drawn by increasing the sample size.…”