2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-015-1661-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of climate change on future flood damage on the river Meuse, with a distributed uncertainty analysis

Abstract: Flood-risk assessments are an objective and quantitative basis for implementing harmonized flood mitigation policies at the basin scale. However, the generated results are subject to different sources of uncertainty arising from underlying assumptions, data availability and the random nature of the phenomenon. These sources of uncertainty are likely to bias conclusions because they are irregularly distributed in space. Therefore, this paper addresses the question of the influence of local features on the expec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the downstream boundary conditions expressed by Eq. (1) leads to Froude numbers in our simulation domain ranging between 0.1 and 0.4, which matches detailed flow computations performed for typical real-world floodplains of lowland rivers (Beckers et al 2013, Detrembleur et al 2015).…”
Section: Boundary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Also, the downstream boundary conditions expressed by Eq. (1) leads to Froude numbers in our simulation domain ranging between 0.1 and 0.4, which matches detailed flow computations performed for typical real-world floodplains of lowland rivers (Beckers et al 2013, Detrembleur et al 2015).…”
Section: Boundary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This model has been extensively validated and applied for simulating flow induced by dam and dike breaching Roger et al, 2009) as well as for conducting flood risk analysis (Arrault et al, 2016;Beckers et al, 2013;Bruwier et al, 2015;Detrembleur et al, 2015;Ernst et al, 2010).…”
Section: Hydraulic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the hydraulic analysis, we used the academic model WOLF 2D, which solves the shallow-water equations by means of a stable and conservative finite volume scheme. This model has been extensively validated and applied for simulating flow induced by dam and dike breaching (Dewals et al, 2011;Roger et al, 2009) as well as for conducting flood risk analysis (Arrault et al, 2016;Beckers et al, 2013;Bruwier et al, 2015;Detrembleur et al, 2015;Ernst et al, 2010).…”
Section: Hydraulic Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%