2010
DOI: 10.3354/meps08856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of contaminant sources on marine fish abundance and species richness: a review and meta-analysis of evidence from the field

Abstract: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the in situ effects of contaminant sources on fish abundance and species richness. We discuss these effects and examine the role of contaminant sources, habitats, and study systems. We also highlight the role of fish ecology in determining contaminant impacts, mechanisms of impact, and areas for future research. A total of 45 papers were analyzed in the meta-analysis, which revealed that the average change in abundance at contaminated sites was +103× (fish … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(145 reference statements)
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Negative effects of pollutants on biogenic habitat such as the larger canopy-forming kelps present in these regions may well result in a reduction in the number of species and individuals observed on rocky reefs, as has been noted in studies of other pollutants and habitat types (Deegan et al, 2002;McKinley and Johnston, 2010) or related to other causes for loss of some of the same kelp species (Ling, 2008). However, it is also possible that observed patterns may partially reflect outcomes of direct impacts on the growth, fecundity Distance from the Hobart port (km) and performance of some species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Negative effects of pollutants on biogenic habitat such as the larger canopy-forming kelps present in these regions may well result in a reduction in the number of species and individuals observed on rocky reefs, as has been noted in studies of other pollutants and habitat types (Deegan et al, 2002;McKinley and Johnston, 2010) or related to other causes for loss of some of the same kelp species (Ling, 2008). However, it is also possible that observed patterns may partially reflect outcomes of direct impacts on the growth, fecundity Distance from the Hobart port (km) and performance of some species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…modes or life-history characteristics (Reish, 1955;Heck, 1976;Pearson and Rosenberg, 1978;Warwick, 1986;Schaaf et al, 1987;Claudet and Fraschetti, 2010;Edgar et al, 2010). Few studies have assessed pollution impacts on marine fishes at the community level, but from those included in the meta-analysis of McKinley and Johnston (2010), positive responses in overall abundance and species richness to organic enrichment were the only relatively consistent trends identified. The clearest message apparent from previous research is that community-level responses to urbanisation may be complex and unpredictable, affected by varying tolerances of different species to numerous contaminants and sources of disturbance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A recent metaanalysis of contaminants, such as nitrogen enrichment, found that point sources (e.g. fish farms and sewage treatment plants) had a positive effect on fish abundances, while diffuse sources such as run-off produced negative effects (McKinley & Johnston 2010). It is possible that pollutants other than nutrients that are present in run-off, the main source of enrichment in this study, have negative effects on higher trophic levels, such as fish, that are not apparent in studies from point source enrichment (van der Oost et al 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine fishes have been affected by many anthropogenic stressors such as overfishing and pollution (Pauly et al, 2002;Pereira et al, 2014) which can cause a decline on species richness and abundance (e.g., McKinley and Johnston, 2010). Overfishing is generally regarded as the major human activity impacting fish assemblages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%