2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss of native rocky reef biodiversity in Australian metropolitan embayments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it might be possible to standardize CWM values of the vulnerability index by local SST to provide a metric that is comparable among regions, the tight relationship with temperature indicates that future changes in its values may be influenced by ocean warming. In addition to this, a recent study showed that the CWM of the vulnerability index based on RLS data (as we used here) was very closely associated with a pollution gradient, with a trend in the opposite direction to that expected from fishing pressure (i.e., increasing prevalence of vulnerable species with greater fishing pressure; Stuart-Smith et al 2015b). This and the strong relationship with SST imply that the vulnerability index has poor specificity for fishing impacts (Shin et al 2010), and although it describes important variation related to overall human impacts, its interpretation as a fishing indicator could be confounded by changes arising from pollution or warming when these pressures geographically overlap.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Fishing Indicatorssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although it might be possible to standardize CWM values of the vulnerability index by local SST to provide a metric that is comparable among regions, the tight relationship with temperature indicates that future changes in its values may be influenced by ocean warming. In addition to this, a recent study showed that the CWM of the vulnerability index based on RLS data (as we used here) was very closely associated with a pollution gradient, with a trend in the opposite direction to that expected from fishing pressure (i.e., increasing prevalence of vulnerable species with greater fishing pressure; Stuart-Smith et al 2015b). This and the strong relationship with SST imply that the vulnerability index has poor specificity for fishing impacts (Shin et al 2010), and although it describes important variation related to overall human impacts, its interpretation as a fishing indicator could be confounded by changes arising from pollution or warming when these pressures geographically overlap.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Fishing Indicatorssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The threat posed by invasive species can also be considered part of the ecological state at a given location and so is not clearly placed among the categories of indicators in standard frameworks (i.e., it could be considered a pressure or state in the drivers–pressure–state–impact–response, or DPSIR, framework; Smeets and Weterings 1999). We consider the abundance of invasive species here as a direct metric of ecological state relating to this pressure and summarize national patterns in their proportional abundance among mobile invertebrates and small bottom-dwelling fishes recorded from RLS surveys (as was previously applied to the RLS data in Stuart-Smith et al 2015b). …”
Section: The Current Status Of Reef Biodiversity Around Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is important to understand the spatial patterns of human impacts to inform conservation planning, especially in tropical developing countries. Proximity to large human settlements may be associated with higher environmental degradation, owing to the increased demand for natural resources, more waste and pollution, or the greater probability of the introduction of invasive species (Halpern, Selkoe, Micheli, & Kappel, ; Spear, Foxcroft, Bezuidenhout, & McGeoch, ; Stuart‐Smith et al, ). Regions with high human densities have higher rates of deforestation (Laurance et al, ), reduced species richness of birds and mammals (McKinney, Kick, & Fulkerson, ), as well as reduced functional diversity, biomass, and average trophic level of fish (Brewer, Cinner, Green, Fisher, & Wilson, ; Brewer, Cinner, Green, & Pressey, ; Clausen & York, ; D'agata et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rocky reefs in the greater Sydney region have been surveyed for fish and mobile invertebrate diversity and abundance in an ad hoc manner since 2008 as part of the Reef Life Survey citizen science project. A recent publication from this work (Stuart-Smith et al 2015) has shown the relatively high fish diversity of Sydney Harbour (20-25 species per 500 m 2 ) compared with other heavily urbanised estuaries in Australia (Port Phillip Bay and Derwent Estuary with 5-10 species per 500 m 2 each). This study also indicated that within Sydney Harbour, heavily impacted sites (as characterised by had fewer fish and invertebrates, reduced total fish biomass and tended to be characterised by smaller fish species.…”
Section: The Natural Habitats Of Sydney Harbour Subtidal Rocky Reefsmentioning
confidence: 71%