2011
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-011-0369-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of dolomitization on the petrophysical properties of El-Halal Formation, North Sinai, Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the literatures, m varies from slightly less than 1.0 up to 5.12 for well-consolidated rocks, as the lithology factor may reach high values up to 9.0 for Fig. 8 Dependence of the electric anisotropy λ E on a electric foliation F E and b electric lineation L E for the studied petrophysical facies Table 2 Petrophysical and electric pore fabric parameters for the studied Albian-Cenomanian facies in north Eastern Desert σ b bulk density, σ g grain density, ∅c connected porosity, F formation resistivity factor, F av average F, T electric tortuosity, F E electric foliation, L E electric lineation, λ E electric anisotropy carbonate rock samples (Wyble 1958;Aguilera 1976;Keller 1982;Jorgensen 1988;Salem and Chilingarian 1999;Nabawy 2013;Nabway and Kassab 2013). For the present samples, the relatively high a value for facies 1 may be attributed to its calcareous content, whereas the relatively low a value for facies 3 may be attributed to its clay content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literatures, m varies from slightly less than 1.0 up to 5.12 for well-consolidated rocks, as the lithology factor may reach high values up to 9.0 for Fig. 8 Dependence of the electric anisotropy λ E on a electric foliation F E and b electric lineation L E for the studied petrophysical facies Table 2 Petrophysical and electric pore fabric parameters for the studied Albian-Cenomanian facies in north Eastern Desert σ b bulk density, σ g grain density, ∅c connected porosity, F formation resistivity factor, F av average F, T electric tortuosity, F E electric foliation, L E electric lineation, λ E electric anisotropy carbonate rock samples (Wyble 1958;Aguilera 1976;Keller 1982;Jorgensen 1988;Salem and Chilingarian 1999;Nabawy 2013;Nabway and Kassab 2013). For the present samples, the relatively high a value for facies 1 may be attributed to its calcareous content, whereas the relatively low a value for facies 3 may be attributed to its clay content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrophysical studies were used to determine the extent to which the petrophysical behavior was affected by the diagenetic events. Petrophysical data that was extracted revealed that they aren't homogeneous to a large extent, the nonhomogeneous depended on rock type and their pore space distribution, mineralogical composition, fossils, clay content and size of crystal, [42]. The following is a discussion of the studied petrophysical behaviors.…”
Section: Petrophysical Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower average permeability of F2 is seemingly more strongly influenced by smaller pore diameter (i.e. : reduced cross-sectional area of pores and pore throats) than by the calculated tortuosity (Nabawy, 2013;Kassab et al, 2014). The permeability in some samples of Facies F4 is anomalously higher [e.g.…”
Section: Derivation Of Saturation Exponent From Formation Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%