2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2012.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of forest gaps on butterfly diversity in a Bornean peat-swamp forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, the S-1 location was known as the sole location of peat-swamp habitat, while other ones were the lowland habitat, mostly well known for the abundance of community resources. This result was in accordance with Noerdjito (2009), Harmonis (2013), and Matsumoto et al (2015) who reported that in the lowland habitat, the species number of the butterfly was larger than those in peat-swamp habitat (Houlihan et al 2012;Sukma, 2012).…”
Section: The Diversity Of Butterfly Speciessupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned earlier, the S-1 location was known as the sole location of peat-swamp habitat, while other ones were the lowland habitat, mostly well known for the abundance of community resources. This result was in accordance with Noerdjito (2009), Harmonis (2013), and Matsumoto et al (2015) who reported that in the lowland habitat, the species number of the butterfly was larger than those in peat-swamp habitat (Houlihan et al 2012;Sukma, 2012).…”
Section: The Diversity Of Butterfly Speciessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Sukma (2012) has reported that only around 27 species of butterfly in the peat swamp forest in Riau region could be successfully identified. Houlihan et al (2012) also reported that they only could identify 11 species of butterfly in the peatswamp forest in Central Kalimantan using fruits as baits. The limited number of butterfly species in the peat-swamp forest was also confirmed in this study, shown in the lowest number of butterfly species compared to those obtained in the lowland ecosystem.…”
Section: The Habitat Group Of Butterflymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, species diversity in mesic and xeric stands decreased from 2006 to 2007. Several studies found lowered insect species diversity after formation of gaps (Bouget 2003, Greenberg and Forrest 2003, Richardson et al 2010, Houlihan et al 2013), while others found higher diversity (Patrick et al 2012, Houlihan et al 2013, or no effects (Ulyshen et al 2011, Smith et al 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such difference is because some butterflies, such as Japonica saepestriata, Wagimo signatus, Neptis speyeri and N. ilos, were only found in NF. Houlihan et al (2013) suggested that forest degradation greatly affects butterfly communities due to the increase of generalist species being favored under disturbed conditions. Inoue (2003) showed that old secondary forest would be able to give refuge to typical natural forest butterfly species.…”
Section: Forest Degradation and Butterfliesmentioning
confidence: 99%