Impacts of Insulation Techniques on Transient Multiphase Flow Characteristics of Deepwater Catenary Risers

Chin, Y. Doreen; Krishnathasan, K.

doi:10.4043/13291-ms

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An adequate understanding of the behavior of the insulated pipelines under subsea conditions is thus essential to develop models that permit the accurate prediction of such thermal performance. Current efforts to predict the thermal performance of subsea lines involve mainly the use of numerical methods [such as finiteelement commercial software (Rubel and Broussard 1994;Zabaras and Zhang 1997;Zabaras and Zhang 1998;Chin and Krishnathasan 2001;Janoff et al 2004;Davalath and Stevens 2006;Bouchonneau et al 2010) or finite-difference methods (Azzola et al 2004)] to solve the relevant form of the energy equation. However, analytical models on multilayer cylinders (such as insulated pipelines) are scarce in open literature probably because of the complexity of their development.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Cool-Down Behavior of an Insulated Pipe Assembly Under Subsea Conditions

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the cool-down behavior of an insulated pipe assembly under subsea conditions, and an analytical model was developed to predict the cool down of the assembly. The insulated pipe assembly consisted of a straight pipe attached to a production tee and a production elbow, and this was coated with 3 in. of thermal insulation. The pipe assembly was tested in a chamber that can simulate subsea conditions (low temperature, high pressure). The analytical model was the solution to a 1D transient heat-conduction problem of a threelayer solid cylinder. The analytical model was first verified with the use of available commercial software, and then validated against experimental data. Results showed a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of less than 3.8°F between the analytical model and the experimental data at the location with a geometry similar to that for which the analytical model was developed. It was found that the h values calculated from experimental data were significantly smaller than the ones calculated from empirical correlations. However, this variation resulted only in a slight difference in the cool-down temperatures. From the validation of the analytical model, it was concluded that this model can predict cool-down temperatures as a function of time in insulated pipes during shut-in operations.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Cool-Down Behavior of an Insulated Pipe Assembly Under Subsea Conditions

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Optimized Design of Pipe-in-Pipe Systems

Hausner

Dixon

2004

SPE Production &Amp; Facilities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Deepwater subsea developments must address flow-assurance issues, and these increasingly form a more critical part of the design. Pipe-in-pipe (PIP) systems, one of the options available in the designers' toolbox for overcoming these problems, are recognized as thermally efficient, reliable, and proven technology for insulated, subsea transportation of wellbore fluids. Although extremely low U values are achievable, PIP systems come at a cost, with increased weight as a penalty for use in deepwater developments. By applying an "inside-out" optimization process for the design of PIP systems, the top-tension loading on the surface vessel (installation or production) can be reduced significantly while minimizing procurement expenditure on raw materials. Specifically, the design optimization of each component reduces steel volumes as well as the overall outer diameter (OD) of the system. This paper presents the methodology for optimized design of PIP systems and illustrates the potential cost savings in terms of raw materials and installation through a case study for a typical large west African field. Commercial savings related to surface platform hull costs also are presented for a case in which the development employs PIP in catenary risers. Introduction At present, the PIP market is dynamic, with numerous projects requiring PIP solutions and many more examining PIP as a development option. The objective of this paper is to present an optimization design process for PIP systems for deepwater applications, specifically 1000 m or deeper. Rather than employing API standard sizes, this paper focuses on establishing the actual required pipe diameters for the flowline and carrier by performing the thermal and mechanical design in an integrated manner. In this way, the design meets project requirements for production rate and steady-state thermal performance while minimizing the as-installed system cost. Although an important and often driving design consideration in all deepwater developments, cool-down considerations have not been included in the designs generated here. The inside-out design methodology is presented along with the as-installed costs, which have been used as the ultimate comparison condition. The following parameters are investigated, with PIP designs and costs generated for each variable combination.U values of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 W/m2K.Flowline lengths of 5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 km.Water depths of 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, and 3000 m.Two types of insulation material - polyurethane foam (PUF) and microporous (MP) material. In addition to presenting the results for the parametric matrix detailed previously, a project with typical characteristics for a large west African development is discussed, including the cost and top-tension implications on the host platform when employing PIP steel catenary risers (SCRs). With a large number of PIP systems available, it is increasingly difficult to evaluate options rapidly when determining or identifying the most appropriate features on a technical and economic basis. What follows is a brief definition and classification of PIP systems, and two specific criteria can be used to describe any particular one.Insulation type (material-dependent).Structural compliance (configuration-dependent). Associated with each criterion are compatible types of field joints and installation methods. Table 1 is the overall compatibility matrix showing the possible combinations of insulation-material type, field joint, and installation method for the main structural categories because the structural compliance drives the choice of insulation and installation method, with the latter of these heavily influencing fieldjoint selection. PIP systems are more installation-vessel-dependent than conventional pipe. This dependency is more pronounced with:Increasing water depth.Extreme requirements, such as high-pressure/high-temperature (HP/HT) applications.Use for SCRs. Table 2 presents the pros and cons for the three structural classifications. The definitions for structural classification and a description of the insulation-material types are continued in Appendix A. Optimized PIP Design-The Inside-Out Method. The inside-out process for designing focuses on optimizing each layer, from the flowline internal bore outward, so that thickness is minimized. In this way, the cost and weight of the final system are also minimized. This requires the use of non-API-sized pipe for the carrier. The use of non-API size for the flowline is also advocated because it leads to additional cost and weight savings for deep water, particularly for PIP SCRs. For shallow-water applications, the benefits of this approach are limited and may not justify the additional design and procurement complexity. For a deepwater project, significant cost benefits are obtainable. Fig. 1 represents the design methodology for a PIP system with standard API pipe sizes. Fig. 2 represents the design methodology for an optimized PIP system. There is a certain amount of iteration required in this process because the contribution of the carrier pipe's wall thickness to the overall heat-transfer coefficient (OHTC) changes with variations in its diameter and wall thickness. This change in contribution affects the insulation required to achieve the desired U value, which then necessitates recalculation of the carrier diameter and wall thickness. The iteration continues until the optimized combination is achieved. The previously described process is based the calculation of the OHTC (Uo), as provided by the basics of heat-transfer theory and the relative equations. These can be found in Appendix B. It must be stated that this process is based on the simplified 1D heat-transfer rate for convection, conduction, and radiation. Although the OHTC is affected by the fluid and its surroundings' resistance to heat transfer, these are negligible when compared to the insulation and pipes' properties. Furthermore, the process does not take into consideration the Joule-Thomson coefficient, which affects the temperature behavior of the fluid.

show abstract

Impacts of Insulation Techniques on Transient Multiphase Flow Characteristics of Deepwater Catenary Risers

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Cool-Down Behavior of an Insulated Pipe Assembly Under Subsea Conditions

Experimental and Analytical Investigation of the Cool-Down Behavior of an Insulated Pipe Assembly Under Subsea Conditions

Optimized Design of Pipe-in-Pipe Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About