2014
DOI: 10.1037/neu0000068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired awareness of deficits in individuals with neuropsychiatric symptoms after acquired brain injury: Associations with treatment motivation and depressive symptoms.

Abstract: This study demonstrated that when considering awareness groups, more nuanced results arise than when only considering discrepancy scores. From a clinical and scientific standpoint, it is important to distinguish awareness groups in addition to considering mean discrepancy scores.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we showed in one of our previous studies using the same patient population that in general, the level of awareness was average. This outcome suggests that overall, patients as a group had accurate awareness of their deficits (Smeets et al ., ). Furthermore, we also found a high correlation between the self‐report measures of executive functioning from patients and their SOs in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we showed in one of our previous studies using the same patient population that in general, the level of awareness was average. This outcome suggests that overall, patients as a group had accurate awareness of their deficits (Smeets et al ., ). Furthermore, we also found a high correlation between the self‐report measures of executive functioning from patients and their SOs in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Awareness of functional deficits was assessed with the Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS). This instrument was originally developed to assess awareness of deficits after traumatic brain injury, but it has also been used in stroke, Alzheimer's disease, and other neurodegenerative diseases . The PCRS has good validity, reliability, and feasibility in people with traumatic brain injury …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test-retest reliability coefficients are high and range between 0.92-0.97 (5,14). Internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach's alpha) are good (>.90) (15). Overall, the PCRS has good reliability, validity and responsiveness, but reliability information of the different PCRS forms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%