2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired Conflict Detection Differentiates Suicide Attempters From Ideating Nonattempters: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrophysiological responses to emotional stimuli also have been investigated in participants with suicidal thoughts and acts. Albanese et al [ 141 ] used a go/no-go task to distinguish participants with suicidal ideation from those who had made a suicide attempt. They found participants with a history of suicide attempts exhibited deficits in detecting “the need for inhibitory control,” as indexed by a more positive change in the N2 response of the ERP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrophysiological responses to emotional stimuli also have been investigated in participants with suicidal thoughts and acts. Albanese et al [ 141 ] used a go/no-go task to distinguish participants with suicidal ideation from those who had made a suicide attempt. They found participants with a history of suicide attempts exhibited deficits in detecting “the need for inhibitory control,” as indexed by a more positive change in the N2 response of the ERP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As others have noted (Franklin et al, 2017;Gibb & Tyspes, 2019), any single indicator is unlikely to accurately predict future suicide risk. Therefore, the TB LPP should be examined along with other risk factors such as diminished external threat responsivity (e.g., Bauer et al, 2020;Weinberg et al, 2017), cognitive control impairments (Albanese, Macatee, Gallyer, et al, 2019), and abnormal reward responses (Tsypes, Owens, & Gibb, 2019Tyspes, Owens, & Gibb, 2021 to gain a more comprehensive understanding of neurobehavioral suicide risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving affect‐regulation and reflective functioning emerged as a broad theme. Difficulties in self‐regulation are evident across diagnostic categories (Cuthbert & Insel, 2010, 2013; Cuthbert & Kozak, 2013; Hayes et al, 2019; Hofmann & Hayes, 2019; Kotov et al, 2017; Ruggero et al, 2019) and are well documented in suicidal youth (Albanese et al, 2019a, 2019b; Miller et al, 2017; Turecki et al, 2019). Compared to adults, adolescents are more likely to react to situations based on their emotional state (Arain et al, 2013; Choudhury, Blakemore, & Charman, 2006; Peper, van den Heuvel, Mandl, Pol, & van Honk, 2011; Sales & Irwin, 2009; Somerville, Fani, & McClure‐Tone, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, most of the supported interventions include nonsuicidal self‐injury, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts as a unitary construct; although when outcomes are partitioned for these different behaviours, interventions are not statistically significant at reducing suicide attempts (Calati & Courtet, 2016; Glenn, Esposito, Porter, & Robinson, 2019; Ougrin et al, 2015). Although suicidal behaviours may exist along a continuum (Rossouw & Fonagy, 2012; Vrouva, Fonagy, Fearon, & Roussow, 2010), there may be differences between the clinical profiles of people who engage in one type of behaviour versus another, which could have important implications for treatment (Albanese et al, 2019a, 2019b; Dougherty et al, 2009; Liu, Trout, Hernandez, Cheek, & Gerlus, 2017; Nagra, Lin, & Upthegrove, 2016). Understanding the mechanisms of change in therapy may clarify why interventions are effective or ineffective (Carper, Makover, & Kendall, 2017; Kazdin & Nock, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation