2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-0829-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired fear recognition in regular recreational cocaine users

Abstract: There were no group differences in psychopathology or "eyes task" performance, but the RC group, who otherwise had similar illicit substance use histories to the OC group, exhibited impaired fear recognition accuracy compared to the OC and CN groups. The RC group also correctly identified anger, fear, happiness, and surprise, more slowly than CN, but not OC participants. The OC group was slower than CN when correctly identifying disgust. The selective deficit in fear recognition accuracy manifested by the RC g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
51
3
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(61 reference statements)
6
51
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This negative result contrasts with evidence of impaired fear recognition in recreational cocaine users (average use ¼ once per month) (Kemmis et al, 2007) and of similar difficulties as documented using additional emotional recognition tasks in current and abstinent abusers of other drugs (eg, 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine, opiates, alcohol) (Hoshi et al, 2004); (Kornreich et al, 2003;Townshend and Duka, 2003). A possible explanation for this difference may pertain to the inclusion criteria.…”
Section: No Effects Of Cocaine Abuse On Facial and Emotional Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This negative result contrasts with evidence of impaired fear recognition in recreational cocaine users (average use ¼ once per month) (Kemmis et al, 2007) and of similar difficulties as documented using additional emotional recognition tasks in current and abstinent abusers of other drugs (eg, 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine, opiates, alcohol) (Hoshi et al, 2004); (Kornreich et al, 2003;Townshend and Duka, 2003). A possible explanation for this difference may pertain to the inclusion criteria.…”
Section: No Effects Of Cocaine Abuse On Facial and Emotional Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…"DIY instructions should have images rather than text"), three binary choices of the most attractive face (2 sets of female, 1 set of male), and three judgments of whether a face showed any sign of a certain emotion (disgust/anger/fear). The three faces used in the judgment of emotion part of the task were created using Smartmorph software (KEMMIS et al 2007). Each picture was obtained by morphing of a face showing the focus emotion (weight 30%) with a neutral face (weight 70 %) to give a face where the original emotion was difficult to recognize.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cocaine-dependent subjects have empathy-related deficits, specifically in perspective-taking, emotional decoding and emotional empathy (Kemmis, Hall, Kingston, & Morgan, 2007;Preller et al, 2014;Roselli & Ardila, 1996;Verdejo-García, Rivas-Perez, Vilar-López, & Pérez-García, 2007). In addition, they present high levels of alexithymia, that is, deficits in the ability to identify and verbalize their own emotions (Keller, Carroll, Nick, & Rounsaville, 1995;Li &Sinha, 2006).…”
Section: Empathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotional decoding or recognition processes (of both facial expressions and prosody) are essential for cognitive empathy and for inferring one's own and others' thoughts, intentions and feelings (Babcock, Green, & Webb, 2008;Kemmis, Hall, Kingston, & Morgan, 2007;Preller et al, 2014;Roselli & Ardila, 1996;Verdejo-García et al, 2007), and so determining subsequent behaviour (Calder & Young, 2005). In this regard, greater severity of cocaine use has been associated with poorer emotional recognition.…”
Section: Empathymentioning
confidence: 99%