1973
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1973.1140550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance and large signal excitation of satellite-borne antennas in the ionosphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
2

Year Published

1974
1974
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was contrary to existing nonlinear sheath models which predicted an increasing capacitive reactance as frequency and voltage increase [Shkarofsky, 1972;Baker et al, 1973].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…This result was contrary to existing nonlinear sheath models which predicted an increasing capacitive reactance as frequency and voltage increase [Shkarofsky, 1972;Baker et al, 1973].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, analytical sheath derivations that utilize this Boltzmann factor for voltages in excess of the plasma potential for anything other than DC applied potentials in a collisionless plasma are questionable. On the other hand, collisions such as those present in a dense ionospheric plasma, could certainly aid in speeding up the relaxation of the distribution function back to a Maxwellian state over time scales comparable to or less than the period corresponding to VLF frequencies [ Mlodnosky and Garriott , 1963; Baker et al , 1973].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Shkarofsky [1972] extended the analysis of Mlodnosky and Garriott [1963] to include large signal excitation and the effects of an induced electromotive force (emf) resulting from the drift motion of the antenna at orbit speed (i.e., due to v × B 0 ). The following year Baker et al [1973], using the same linear theory, incorporated a DC bias into their model resulting from spacecraft charging between the antenna and the satellite body on which the antenna was mounted. Mlodnosky and Garriott [1963], Shkarofsky [1972], and Baker et al [1973] all used very crude first order approximations of the current and voltage on the antenna and greatly simplified the description of the sheath region through approximations such as uniform charge density and a simple exponential voltage dependence through the sheath.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of early works have included the plasma sheath effects in investigations of the antenna impedance [e.g., Mlodnosky and Garriott , 1963; Shkarofsky , 1972; Baker et al , 1973]. However, the physics of the antenna–plasma interaction, particularly in the case of the high‐voltage antennas, has not been well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%