2005
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2005.856245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance Characterization of Microarray Recording Electrodes in Vitro

Abstract: The mechanisms underlying performance degradation of chronically implanted silicon microelectrode arrays in the central nervous system (CNS) remain unclear. Humoral and cellular components of the brain foreign body response were evaluated to determine whether their presence on the electrode surface results in increased electrical impedance. Iridium oxide microelectrode recording arrays were electrically characterized in saline, culture media with 10% fetal bovine serum, and coated with various CNS cell types i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the build up of collagen (lower conductivity) and transient micro-hematomas (higher conductivity) are common in epidural implants of flexible electrode arrays [40]. In addition, the electrode array's surface geometry has been shown to influence the thickness of encapsulation tissue beneath the array [41], affecting both the electrode-electrolyte interface impedance [42] and the conductivity of the medium between the electrode and the neural sources [43]. For future electrode designs, we will consider alternate substrate geometries and materials that may increase the performance of the array.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the build up of collagen (lower conductivity) and transient micro-hematomas (higher conductivity) are common in epidural implants of flexible electrode arrays [40]. In addition, the electrode array's surface geometry has been shown to influence the thickness of encapsulation tissue beneath the array [41], affecting both the electrode-electrolyte interface impedance [42] and the conductivity of the medium between the electrode and the neural sources [43]. For future electrode designs, we will consider alternate substrate geometries and materials that may increase the performance of the array.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, failing electrode arrays produce low yields. It has been shown that impedance spectroscopy provides insight to the fundamental aspects of biotic and abiotic interactions that affect array performance (Grill and Mortimer, 1994; Merrill and Tresco, 2005; Ludwig et al, 2006, 2011; Williams et al, 2007; McConnell et al, 2009a; Karumbaiah et al, 2013). Combining standard electrophysiological measurements with abiotic and biotic analysis can produce comprehensive insight to electrode failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C is mainly due to the parasitic shunt capacitance of the MCS cable (128 pF) while R ‐value is different in the two configurations. Considering the commercial setup, R is the MEA1060 output resistance (300 Ω) while in the custom system it is mainly given by the source impedance, which results from electrode impedance and cell coupling/adhesion and exceeds 1 MΩ (Merril and Tresco, 2005). Therefore, f cutoff is equal to 4 MHz for the commercial setup (no signal components are cut) and to 1.2 kHz for the custom recording equipment, which is within neuronal spike frequency content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%