Impeding fatal violence through third-party diplomacy: The effect of mediation on conflict intensity

Abstract

Existing research provides no systematic insights into if and how mediation impedes battle-related deaths. Therefore, this article presents a temporally disaggregated analysis and assesses the effect of mediation on monthly fatal violence. The article predicts that adversaries evaluate opponents’ trustworthiness from both fighting and negotiation behavior. It argues that reducing fighting intensity during negotiations is a sign of cooperation, which can be negotiated by mediators to build trust. Over the course of mediation, the content of negotiations provides information about how genuinely a conflict party is interested in conflict resolution. Only if mediation achieves negotiation of core incompatibilities will conflict parties be willing to reduce fighting intensity. Under these conditions, information revealed in a mediation process can build trust and substantively reduce violence. An empirical analysis of all African conflicts between 1993 and 2007 supports this prediction and shows that on average mediation is followed by substantive and lasting reductions in fatal violence, if mediation discusses the conflict’s main incompatibility. In contrast, mediation on other topics is associated with a small, fleeting reduction in violence. Data of battle-related fatalities in Syria during negotiations as well as qualitative evidence further support the theoretical mechanism and the model prediction. The study concludes that mediation can reduce conflict intensity substantively, if it achieves exchange between conflict parties on the main conflict issues.

The diplomatic burden of pandemics: lessons from malaria

“…Accordingly, in countries where diplomatic activity is low, reporting biases and missing information will thus potentially impact the effectiveness of human rights monitoring and reporting. Diplomatic missions also play a key role in conflict prevention and mediation, by allowing third parties to help resolve local bargaining disagreements between two or more warring parties (Ruhe, 2020). Embassies and consulates are likewise important in helping to identify and prevent terrorism, promoting security and stability not only in their sending country, but also-by allowing local and international authorities to target terrorist groups-locally in the host state (de Orellana, 2017).…”

How mediators shape the content of peace agreements: A framework of negotiations over issues

“…However, research on conflict resolution often fails to distinguish even basic agreement categories, such as ceasefires from comprehensive agreements, and has mostly ignored the content of negotiated settlements (cf. Ruhe, 2021). How do third party mediators affect and potentially improve agreement content?…”

Peace Negotiations in Civil Conflicts: A New Dataset

“…Negotiations have a profound impact on civil war processes. They alter incentives and opportunities for violence (Höglund 2008; Sisk 2009; Ruhe 2021); interact with other conflict management instruments including peacekeeping and third-party intervention (DeRouen and Chowdhury 2018; Beardsley et al 2019; Clayton and Dorussen 2022; Owsiak et al 2021); and influence the cohesiveness of rebel groups and decrease the barriers to entry (Lounsbery and Cook 2011; Fjelde and Nilsson 2018; Duursma and Fliervoet 2021). Yet, the systematic study of peace talks remains underdeveloped (Cunningham and Sawyer 2019).…”