1996
DOI: 10.2307/1060886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imperfect Hedging and Export Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analogously, we have F c > 0 for cov( p z) > 0. This is in line with a result from Broll and Wahl (1996) Loosely speaking, the motivation to speculate on the real risk premium is stronger than the motivation to cross hedge untradable in ation risk if risk aversion is small. Increasing expected real wealth is more attractive than reducing the variability o f r e a l w ealth via cross hedging.…”
Section: Optimal Forward Positions Under Independent In Ation Risksupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analogously, we have F c > 0 for cov( p z) > 0. This is in line with a result from Broll and Wahl (1996) Loosely speaking, the motivation to speculate on the real risk premium is stronger than the motivation to cross hedge untradable in ation risk if risk aversion is small. Increasing expected real wealth is more attractive than reducing the variability o f r e a l w ealth via cross hedging.…”
Section: Optimal Forward Positions Under Independent In Ation Risksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…But if in ation risk is replaced by another independent and untradable multiplicative risk that only applies topq, Theorem 1 no longer holds. In that case, the forward position also depends on the individual's prudence in the sense of Kimball (1990) Broll and Wahl (1996) applied it to the problem of cross hedging exchange rate risk. However, in ation risk may require other speci cations of h(p).…”
Section: Optimal Forward Positions Under Independent In Ation Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 The literature has employed many methodological approaches; although the estimated magnitudes differ across studies, the common result is that both variables affect export volumes at significant levels in the direction implied by the standard theory. Some of the prominent articles include: Krugman and Baldwin (1987); Hooper and Marquez (1993); Adams, Gangnes, and Shishido (1993); Afriyie and Kundu (1994); Wilson (1993); Lenz (1992); Broll and Wahl (1996); Sachs and Shatz (1994); Kim (1991), Hooper and Mann (1989), Bryant, Holtham, and Hooper (1988), Cline (1989), and Dornbush and Werner (1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade international firms have been exposed to high foreign exchange risk since major currencies have shown a substantial volatility. The volatility of foreign exchange rates is affecting international trade, foreign direct investments and hedging decisions (Cushman, 1988;Powers and Castelino, 1991;Broll, 1992;Viaene and De Vries, 1992;Dellas and Zilberfarb, 1993;Gagnon, 1993;Broll and Wahl, 1996). This paper studies some of the implications of a firm's export flexibility with regard to its production and hedging decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%