2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-013-0072-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imperfect information and the Meltzer-Richard hypothesis

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A direct test of the MR hypothesis should use policy outcomes as dependent variables. Bredemeier (2014) theoretically discusses those determinants of rising inequality that can account for a lower demand for redistribution. The paper argues that when the income of the poor increases, the perceived inequality decreases (even though the mean-to-median ratio might actually increase) and the demand for redistribution goes down.…”
Section: Related Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct test of the MR hypothesis should use policy outcomes as dependent variables. Bredemeier (2014) theoretically discusses those determinants of rising inequality that can account for a lower demand for redistribution. The paper argues that when the income of the poor increases, the perceived inequality decreases (even though the mean-to-median ratio might actually increase) and the demand for redistribution goes down.…”
Section: Related Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other papers, such as Bredemeier () and De Freitas (), have also obtained this result, but they propose different explanations. While Bredemeier () focuses on tax avoidance with imperfect information, De Freitas () focuses on the incidence of direct and indirect taxes on the size of the underground economy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Although the Gini coefficient is a more common and precise metric of inequality, local‐level Gini data are not available for California in ways that can be aggregated to utility service areas. The mean‐to‐median income ratio is a useful proxy in absence of finer metrics (Birdsall & Meyer, 2015), and generally reflects public perceptions of income distribution (Bredemeier, 2014; Meltzer & Richard, 1983; Perotti, 1992). More densely concentrated populations might increase the likelihood that incidents of water waste are observed at random; meanwhile, there might be less outdoor water use and water waste for people to observe when population density is high.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%